Creation of various Pediatric Vocal Self-Assessment Questionnaires Worldwide: a Scoping Review
Creación de diversos cuestionarios de autoevaluación vocal pediátrica a nivel mundial: una revisión de alcance
Abstract
Introduction. Childhood dysphonia can affect emotionally, socially and/or academically the infant's life, so it is essential to obtain a complete evaluation at vocal level, considering voice self-assessment.
Objective. To know and describe the characteristics of pediatric vocal self-assessment instruments created worldwide.
Method. A review of the scope was conducted in accordance with the methodologically established search criteria. The data analysis was performed after the search in several scientific database platforms. Twelve articles were incorporated into the final review and, based on the results obtained, 17 vocal self-evaluation questionnaires were described, indicating their evaluation objectives, structural conformation, target population, country of creation, methodological construction and psychometric characteristics.
Results. 17 original vocal self-assessment questionnaires were found, published in Italian, English, Portuguese, and Spanish. The studies considered several vocal pathologies and variable age ranges, including population from 0 to 21 years of age, The sample used was variable, with 3 publications with an experimental group of less than 100 subjects. 4 investigations presented adaptations of questionnaires originally created for adult voice and 2 investigations presented abbreviations of original questionnaires for pediatric voice. Considering the description of psychometric measures, 1 questionnaire presented sensitivity and specificity, 2 questionnaires presented validity and reliability, 4 questionnaires presented only reliability, 6 questionnaires presented specificity, sensitivity, and efficiency, and 4 questionnaires described reliability, validity, specificity, and sensitivity.
Conclusion. 17 original pediatric vocal self-assessment questionnaires were identified and described.
Downloads
Authors
Keywords
References
Gómez Sánchez V. Estudio de la vulnerabilidad de la voz en niños de 8 y 10 años con disfonía infantil [bachelor’s thesis]. [Cantabria]: Universidad de Cantabria; 2015. 27 p. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10902/15618
Fleta Zaragozano J. Disfonía en la infancia. Valoración y pauta a seguir. Boletín de la Sociedad de Pediatría de Aragón, La Rioja y Soria [Internet]. 2021;51(2): 81-5. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8098046
Antón Almero M, Reig Montaner E, Ferrer Ramírez MJ, Doménech Máñez I, Huerta Barberá S, Revenga Nieto G. D. Impacto de la disfonía en la calidad de vida en la edad infantil. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología [Internet]. 2022;42(4): 208-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2021.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2021.02.005
Alcaíno Navarrete VP, Bobadilla Mellado PA, Cortés Arellano VE, Pozo Bustamante AA. Cuestionarios que evalúan la calidad de vida relacionada con disfonía en población pediátrica: una revisión sistemática. [bachelor's tesis]. Talca: Universidad de Talca; 2020. 53 p. Available from: http://dspace.utalca.cl/handle/1950/12880
Centeno D, Nercelles L, Valenzuela J, Catalán C. Análisis descriptivo del índice de discapacidad vocal pediátrico en niños con patología vocal benigna. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2022;82(1):16-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-48162022000100016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-48162022000100016
Malebrán MC, Henríquez L, Contreras-Ruston F. Revisión narrativa de instrumentos de autoevaluación vocal en Chile. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2021;81(4):615-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-48162021000400615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-48162021000400615
Inostroza-Moreno G. Orientaciones filosóficas en la intervención fonoaudiológica de voz. El desafío actual de dar el alta. Rev Investig Innov Cienc Salud [Internet]. 2021;3(1):116-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.34
Chambergo-Michilot D, Diaz-Barrera ME, Benites-Zapata VA. Revisiones de alcance, revisiones paraguas y síntesis enfocada en revisión de mapas: aspectos metodológicos y aplicaciones. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica [Internet]. 2021;38:136-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2021.381.6501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2021.381.6501
Grant M, Brooth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J [Internet]. 2009;26(2):91-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ [Internet]. 2021;372:n71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Hartnick CJ. Validation of a pediatric voice quality-of-life instrument: the pediatric voice outcome survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2002;128(8):919-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.128.8.919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.128.8.919
Boseley ME, Cunningham MJ, Volk MS, Hartnick CJ. Validation of the pediatric voice-related quality-of-life survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2006;132(7):717-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.132.7.717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.132.7.717
Zur KB, Cotton S, Kelchner L, Baker S, Weinrich B, Lee L. Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI): a new tool for evaluating pediatric dysphonia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2007;71(1):77-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.09.004
Cohen JT, Oestreicher-Kedem Y, Fliss DM, DeRowe A. Glottal function index: a predictor of glottal disorders in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Internet]. 2007;116(2):81-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940711600201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940711600201
Verduyckt I, Morsomme D, Remacle M. Validation and standardization of the Pediatric Voice Symptom Questionnaire: a double-form questionnaire for dysphonic children and their parents. J Voice [Internet]. 2012;26(4):e129-e139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.08.001
Ricci-Maccarini A, De Maio V, Murry T, Schindler A. Development and validation of the children's voice handicap index-10 (CVHI-10). J Voice [Internet]. 2013;27(2):258.e23-258.e28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.10.006
Ricci-Maccarini A, De Maio V, Murry T, Schindler A. Development and validation of the Children's Voice Handicap Index-10 for parents. J Voice [Internet]. 2016;30(1):120-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.10.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.10.004
Cohen W, Wynne DM. Parent and child responses to the pediatric voice-related quality-of-life questionnaire. J Voice [Internet]. 2015;29(3):299-303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.08.004
Sanz L, Bau P, Arribas I, Rivera T. Development and validation of a short version of the Spanish pediatric voice handicap index (P-VHI-10). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2016;88:113-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.06.053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.06.053
Lima L, Behlau M. Pediatric Vocal Symptoms Questionnaire (PVSQ): Four new versions for parental evaluation and self-evaluation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2020;131:109816. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109816
Yağcıoğlu D, Aydınlı FE, Aslan G, Kirazlı MÇ, Köse A, Doğan, N. Development, Validation, and Reliability of the Teacher-Reported Pediatric Voice Handicap Index. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch [Internet]. 2022;53(1):69-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00033
Amir O, Bar-David OY, Goldstein S, Epstein R, Alston M, Roziner I, et al. Development and Validation of the Children’s Voice Questionnaire (CVQ). J Voice [Internet]. Forthcoming 2023 Oct 31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.09.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.09.030
Bach KK, Belafsky PC, Wasylik K, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the glottal function index. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2005;131(11):961-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.11.961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.11.961
Crevier Buchman L, Mattei A, Giovanni A. Uso forzado de la voz. EMC-Otorrinolaringología [Internet]. 2020;49(1):1-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1632-3475(19)43324-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1632-3475(19)43324-9
Batista GKS, Simões-Zenari M, Nemr K. Cut-off point for high dysphonia risk in children based on the Child Dysphonia Risk Screening Protocol: preliminary findings. Clinics (Sao Paulo) [Internet]. 2020;75:e1682. doi: https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1682
Nemr NK, Simões-Zenari M, Lobrigate KE. Proposal for pediatric population dysphonic screening protocol. 42nd Annual Symposium: Care of the Professional Voice; 2013 May 29 - Jun 2; Philadelphia: The Voice Foundation.
Carvajal A, Centeno C, Watson R, Martínez M, Sanz Rubiales Á. ¿Cómo validar un instrumento de medida de la salud? An sist sanit Navar [Internet]. 2011;34(1):63-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272011000100007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272011000100007
Jiménez González MA, Aguilera Ramírez M, Morales Vázquez E. El aprendizaje de Inglés como Segunda Lengua mediante la traducción bidireccional. Cienc lat [Internet]. 2023;7(2):3594-619. doi: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i2.5601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i2.5601
Manterola C, Otzen T. Porqué investigar y cómo conducir una investigación. Int J Morphol [Internet]. 2013;31(4):1498-504. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022013000400056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022013000400056
Ministerio de Desarrollo Social y Familia de Chile, Subsecretaría de la Niñez de Chile. Guía Didáctica para la Ley 21.430. Sobre Garantías y Protección Integral de los Derechos de la Niñez y Adolescencia. The World Bank; 2022, 76 p.
Valdés Cuervo ÁA, Carlos Martínez EA, Vera Noriega JÁ, Montoya Verdugo G. Propiedades psicométricas de un instrumento para medir las relaciones familiares en adolescentes intelectualmente sobresalientes. Pensam psicol [Internet]. 2012;10(1), 39-50. Available from: https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/pensamientopsicologico/article/view/209
Luján Tangarife JA, Cardona Arias JA. Construcción y validación de escalas de medición en salud: revisión de propiedades psicométricas. Archivos de Medicina [Internet]. 2015;11(3):1-10. Available from: https://www.itmedicalteam.pl/articles/construccin-y-validacin-de-escalasde-medicin-en-salud-revisin-depropiedades-psicomtricas-103291.html
Argibay JC. Técnicas psicométricas. Cuestiones de validez y confiabilidad. Subj procesos cogn [Internet]. 2006;(8):15-33. Available from: http://dspace.uces.edu.ar:8180/xmlui/handle/123456789/765
Rosario-Rodríguez A, Rodríguez-Montalbán R, Martínez-Lugo M. Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Comportamientos de Ciudadanía Organizacional (ECCO). Rev Puertorriquena Psicol [Internet]. 2019;30(1):30-46. Available from: https://www.repsasppr.net/index.php/reps/article/view/393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t74136-000