Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Voice disorders in teachers and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)

Trastornos de la voz en docentes y Clasificación Internacional de Funcionamiento, Discapacidad y Salud (CIF)


Portada Vol. 3, Num. 1.
Open | Download


Section
Review Articles

How to Cite
1.
Voice disorders in teachers and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Rev. Investig. Innov. Cienc. Salud [Internet]. 2021 Aug. 3 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];3(1):33-47. Available from: https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/60

Dimensions
PlumX
Léslie Piccolotto Ferreira

    Introduction. Contemporary occupational diseases are increasingly expressed by function disorders, which include voice disorders, forcing workers to request a leave of absence from work and leading to an incapacity to perform their work activities. Teachers have the higher prevalence of vocal disorders among the professionals who use their voices professionally, which is reported as the second cause of teaching work absences in Brazil.

    Objective. To analyze the environment and organization aspects of the teaching work associated with the development of voice disorder of teachers, according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

    Method. This study consisted of two steps. Initially, an integrative bibliographic review was performed to search for references related to the topic in the LILACS, MEDLINE and SCIELO databases, using the health descriptors "voice disorders" and "teachers". Then, the selected articles were read in full in order to identify the work factors associated with the voice disorder and compared with the theoretical framework of the ICF, in order to identify possible indicators of loss of functioning and capacity for teaching work resulting from voice disorders.

    Results. The presence of dust and noise were the most prevalent environment aspects. In turn, the high demand for work and the lack of autonomy to perform the work were identified as factors related to the organization of the work of the teaching work, as well as stress at work and the presence of situations of violence at school as the most reported work absences.

    Conclusion. As shown, the factors of teaching work described impact all components of functioning and lead to the incapacity of the teacher to work. The use of the ICF may contribute to systematize and quantify, in a standardized way, the loss of functioning and work capacity resulting from voice disorders, in addition to assisting in the development of public health promotion policies and in the prevention of vocal disorders in teachers.


    Article visits 1198 | PDF visits 765


    1. Wünsch FV. The Brazilian Workers' Epidemiological Profile. Rev Bras Med Trab. [Internet]. 2004 Abr/Jun [cited 2021 Apr 12];2(2):103-117. Available from: http://www.rbmt.org.br/how-to-cite/200/en-US
    2. Assunção AA, Oliveira DA. Work intensification and teachers' health. Educ. Soc., São Paulo. [Internet]. 2009;30(107):349-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302009000200003.
    3. Roy N, Merrill RM, Thibeault S, Parsa RA, Gray SD, Smith EM. Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. J. Speech Lang. Hear. 2004;47:281-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/023)
    4. Giannini SPP, Latorre MRDO, Fischer FM, Ghirardi ACAM, Ferreira LP. Teachers’ voice disorders and loss of work ability: a case-control study. J Voice. 2015;29(2):209-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.06.004
    5. Araújo TM, Reis EJFB, Carvalho FM, Porto LA, Reis IC, Andrade JM. Factors associated with voice disorders among women teachers. Cad. Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2008 June [cited 2021 Apr 12];24(6): 1229-1238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2008000600004
    6. Cutiva LCC, Vogel I, Burdof A. Voice disorders in teachers and their associations with work-related factors: a systematic review. J Commun Disord. Amsterdam. [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Apr 12]; 46(2): 143-155. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.01.001.
    7. Masson MLV, Ferrite S, Pereira LMA, Ferreira LP, Araújo TM. Seeking the recognition of voice disorder as work-related disease: historical-political movement. Ciênc. saúde coletiva [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020-09-26];24(3):805-816.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018243.00502017
    8. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Vigilância em Saúde Ambiental e Saúde do Trabalhador. Distúrbio de Voz Relacionado ao Trabalho – DVRT / Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância em Saúde Ambiental e Saúde do Trabalhador. – Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2018. Portuguese. Available from: https://cutt.ly/Enc6Vah
    9. Dejours C. A loucura do trabalho: estudo da psicopatologia do trabalho. 5a.ed. São Paulo: Cortez-Oboré; 2000. Portuguese.
    10. Farias N, Buchalla CM. The international classification of functioning, disability and health: concepts, uses and perspectives. Rev. bras. epidemiol. 2005;8(2):187-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2005000200011
    11. Marcelino MA, Núbila HBV. A Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde (CIF) e potenciais aplicações em Saúde do Trabalhador. In: Mendes R. Patologia do trabalho. 3ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Atheneu; 2013. Portuguese.
    12. Souza MT, Silva MD, Carvalho R. Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? [Internet]. 2010 Mar [cited 2021 Apr 12]; 8(1): 102-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082010rw1134
    13. Dragone MLS, Ferreira LP, Giannini SPP, Simões-Zenari M, Vieira VP, Behlau M. Teachers' voice: a review of 15 years of SLP contribution. Rev. soc. bras. fonoaudiol. [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2021 Apr 12];15(2):289-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342010000200023
    14. CIF: Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde (Centro Colaborador da Organização Mundial da Saúde para a Família de Classificações Internacionais em Português). Buchalla CM, organização e coordenação da tradução. 2ª ed. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo; 2015. Portuguese.
    15. Preciado J, Pérez C, Calzada M, Preciado P. Frecuencia y factores de riesgo de los trastornos de la voz en el personal docente de la rioja. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2005;56(4):161-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6519(05)78593-9
    16. Hypolito AM. Trabalho docente, classe social e relações de gênero. Papirus; 1997. Portuguese.
    17. Cielo CA, Finger LS, Roman-Niehues G, Deuschle VP, Siqueira MA. Organic-functional dysphonia and complains off allergic and/or digestive disturbance. Rev. CEFAC. 2009;11(3):431-439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462009000300010
    18. Provenzano LCFA, Sampaio TMM. Prevalence of vocal dysfunction in teachers from the state education, licensed from classroom. Rev. CEFAC [Internet]. 2010 Feb [cited 2021 Apr 12];12(1):97-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462010000100013
    19. Souza TMT, Trentini AL, Lopes SS, Takahashi HTN. Bem-estar vocal no ingresso de professores / Projeto de promoção da saúde e vigilância do município de São Paulo. In: Ferreira LP, Silva MAA, Giannini SPP. Distúrbio de Voz Relacionado ao Trabalho: Práticas Fonoaudiológicas. São Paulo: ROCA; 2015. p. 119-25. Portuguese.
    20. Ferreira LP, Giannini SPP, Figueira S, Silva EE, Karmann DF, Souza TMT. Condições de Produção Vocal de Professores da Rede do Município de São Paulo. Distúrb Comun. São Paulo. 2003;14(2):275-308. Available from: https://revistas.pucsp.br/dic/article/view/11333
    21. Medeiros AM, Barreto SM, Assunção AA.. Voice disorder (dysphonia) in public school female teachers working in Belo Horizonte: prevalence and associated factors. JVoice. 2008;22(6):676-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.03.008
    22. Seligmann-Silva E. Desemprego: a dimensão psicossocial. In: La Psicología al fin del siglo: conferencias magistrales del XVII Congreso Interamericano de Psicología.V. 1 Caracas: Sociedad Interamericana de Psicología; 1999. p. 337-359.
    23. Ferreira LP, Bernardi APA. Distúrbio de voz relacionado ao trabalho: resgate histórico. Distúrb Comun. 2011;23:233-237. Available from: https://revistas.pucsp.br/dic/article/view/8285
    24. Karmann DF, Lancman S. Teacher – work intensification and use of voice. Audiol., Commun. Res. 2013;18(3):162-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-64312013000300005.
    25. Marçal CCB, Peres MA. Self-reported voice problems among teachers: prevalence and associated factors. Rev. Saúde Públ. 2011;45(3):503-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102011005000025
    26. Martinez MC, Paraguay AIBB, Latorre MRDO. Relationship between psychosocial job satisfaction and health in white collar workers. Rev. Saúde Públ. 2004;38(1):55-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102004000100008
    27. Behlau M, Zambon F, Guerrieri AC, Roy N. Epidemiology of Voice Disorders in Teachers and Nonteachers in Brazil: Prevalence and Adverse Effects. J Voice. 2012;25(2):665e 9-665. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.09.010
    28. Titze IR, Lemke J, Montequin D. Populations in the U.S. workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade: a preliminary report. J Voice.1997;11(3):254-59. DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(97)80002-1
    29. Toldrá RC, Daldon MTB, Santos MC, Lancman S. Facilitating factors and barriers for returning to work : the experience of workers treated at a workers' health reference center in São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Bras Saude Ocup. 2010;35(121):10-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0303-76572010000100003
    30. Canguilhem G. O normal e o patológico. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária; 2000.
    Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |