Development of a Virtual Platform for Clinical Reasoning Training of Speech-Therapy Students

Desarrollo de una plataforma virtual para el entrenamiento de razonamiento clínico en estudiantes de fonoaudiología

Published 2023-05-29 — Updated on 2023-07-13

Open | Download
HTML Icon XML Icon PDF Icon Flip Icon
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023)
Section
Research Article
How to Cite
1.
Development of a Virtual Platform for Clinical Reasoning Training of Speech-Therapy Students. Rev. Investig. Innov. Cienc. Salud [Internet]. 2023 Jul. 13 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];5(1):29-45. Available from: https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/168
DOI

https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.168
Dimensions
PlumX
license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Manuel Nibaldo Del Campo Rivas
Escuela de Fonoaudiología; Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud; Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez; Santiago; Chile
    https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6076-2734
    Angélica Pilar Silva-Ríos
    Escuela de Fonoaudiología; Facultad de Salud; Universidad Santo Tomás; Chile
      https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2116-1087
      Show authors biography

      Objective. To develop a virtual learning platform (VLP) for CR training in speech therapy students.

      Method. Applied research based on software development. PHP programming language version 7.3.26, graphics and transitions in framework Laravel 8 and Vue 2 with Vuetify were used. The database management of the project was executed in MySql 5.5.

      Results. A VLP was created for storage and use of clinical scripts based on script concordance test. The operative functions of platform included three profiles: teachers, students, and managers. Students accessed a random corpus of previously validated scripts. Teachers had access to usability statistics and student grades, and the manager could upload new scripts, review statistics, resolve support issues, and assign roles.

      Conclusions. The VLP developed offers support for scripts training methodology in speech therapy. Educational innovation processes diversify learning strategies and promote the development of relevant skills for decision-making in the fields of diagnosis, study, and intervention.

      Article visits 653 | PDF visits 174

      1. Parra Acosta H, López Loya J, González Carrillo E, Moriel Corral L, Vázquez Aguirre AD, González Zambada NC, et al. Las tecnologías del aprendizaje y del conocimiento (TAC) y la formación integral y humanista del médico. Investig En Educ Médica [Internet]. 2019 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];8(31):72-81. Disponible en: http://riem.facmed.unam.mx/index.php/riem/article/view/160
      2. Castro TC, Gonçalves LS. The use of gamification to teach in the nursing field. Rev Bras Enferm [Internet]. 2018 [citado 12 de marzo de 2022];71(3):1038-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0023
      3. Pei L, Wu H. Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ Online [Internet]. 2019 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];24(1):1666538. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538
      4. Barbosa ML, Atanasio LL de M, Medeiros SG de, Saraiva COP de O, Santos VEP. Evolution of nursing teaching in the use of education technology: a scoping review. Rev Bras Enferm [Internet]. 2021 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];74(suppl 5):e20200422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0422
      5. Otero Escobar AD. Plataformas Virtuales de Aprendizaje en la Educación Superior. Interconectando Saberes [Internet]. 2017 [citado 17 de marzo de 2022];(4):83-100. Disponible en: https://is.uv.mx/index.php/IS/article/view/2545
      6. Kay D, Pasarica M. Using technology to increase student (and faculty satisfaction with) engagement in medical education. Adv Physiol Educ [Internet]. 2019 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];43(3):408-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00033.2019
      7. O’donovan J, Maruthappu M. Distant peer-tutoring of clinical skills, using tablets with instructional videos and Skype: A pilot study in the UK and Malaysia. Med Teach [Internet]. 2015 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];37(5):463-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.956063
      8. Matamala C, Hinostroza JE, Matamala C, Hinostroza JE. Factores relacionados con el uso académico de Internet en educación superior. Pensam Educ [Internet]. 2020 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];57(1):1-19. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.7764/pel.57.1.2020.7
      9. Páez H, Arreaza E. Uso de una plataforma virtual de aprendizaje en educación superior.: Caso nicenet.org. Paradígma [Internet]. 2005 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];26(1):201-39. Disponible en: http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1011-22512005000100009&lng=es&tlng=es.
      10. Tejedor S, Cervi L, Tusa F, Parola A. Los docentes universitarios frente al cambio a la educación virtual impuesta por el coronavirus. Soc E Estado [Internet]. 2021 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];36:915-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202136030004
      11. Cooke S, Lemay JF, Beran T. Evolutions in clinical reasoning assessment: The Evolving Script Concordance Test. Med Teach [Internet]. 2017 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];39(8):828-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1327706
      12. Padilha JM, Machado PP, Ribeiro A, Ramos J, Costa P. Clinical Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2019 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];21(3):e11529. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/11529
      13. Pennaforte T, Moussa A, Loye N, Charlin B, Audétat MC. Exploring a New Simulation Approach to Improve Clinical Reasoning Teaching and Assessment: Randomized Trial Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc [Internet]. 2016 [citado 22 de marzo de 2022];5(1):e4938. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.4938
      14. Charlin B, Tardif J, Boshuizen HP. Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll [Internet]. 2000 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];75(2):182-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200002000-00020
      15. Norman, G. Building on experience —The development of clinical reasoning. The New England Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2006 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];355(21):2251-2252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe068134
      16. Arceo M, Durante E. Desarrollo y evaluación de los scripts durante la formación profesional. Rev Hosp Ital B Aires [Internet]. 2013 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];33(4):144-52. Disponible en: https://tinyurl.com/2pv6h5uw
      17. del Campo Rivas MN, Silva-Ríos AP. Prueba de concordancia de guiones para entrenar el razonamiento clínico en estudiantes de fonoaudiología. Revista de Investigación en Logopedia [Internet]. 2023 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];13(1): e80748. doi: https://doi.org/10.5209/rlog.80748
      18. Delavari S, Amini M, Sohrabi Z, Koohestani H, Delavari S, Rezaee R, et al. Desarrollo y psicometría del test de concordancia de guión (SCT) en partería. Med J Islam Repub Irán [Internet]. 2018 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];32(1):434-439
      19. doi: https://doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.32.75
      20. Bhardwaj P, Black E, Fantone J, Lopez M, Kelly M. Script Concordance Tests for Formative Clinical Reasoning and Problem-Solving Assessment in General Pediatrics. MedEdPORTAL : the Journal of Teaching and Learning Resources [Internet]. 2022 [citado 16 de diciembre de 2022];8:11274. doi: https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11274
      21. Romero, L. Desplazamiento respecto de los saberes disciplinares de la Fonoaudiología. Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiología [Internet]. 2012 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022]; 11(0). doi: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-4692.2012.24520
      22. Bustos M, Arancibia C, Muñoz N, Azócar J. La Simulación Clínica en Atención Primaria de Salud en contexto de docencia: Una experiencia con estudiantes de Fonoaudiología. Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiología [Internet]. 2018 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];17:1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-4692.2018.51599
      23. Rodríguez D, Morales C, Abd-El-Kader G, Fuentes L, Henríquez F, Carrasco P. Caracterización del uso de fuentes de información para el acceso a criterios diagnóstico por parte de fonoaudiólogas y fonoaudiólogos en Chile. Revista Chilena de Fonoaudiología [Internet]. 2019 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];18:1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-4692.2019.55329
      24. Montaldo L, Herskovic L. (2013). Aprendizaje del razonamiento clínico por reconocimiento de patrón, en seminarios de casos clínicos prototipos, por estudiantes de tercer año de medicina. Revista médica de Chile [Internet]. 2013 [citado 16 de marzo de 2022];141(7):823-830. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872013000700001
      25. Ramiro Miranda A, López Valencia M, Serra S, Ramiro Miranda A, López Valencia M, Serra S. Percepciones de estudiantes de fonoaudiología sobre el aprendizaje basado en simulación y gamificación. Educ Med Super [Internet]. 2022 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];36(2):e2567. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21412022000200011&lng=es
      26. Candia García F. Estrategias para la innovación educativa en la educación superior hacia el 2030. RIDE Rev Iberoam Para Investig El Desarro Educ [Internet]. 2021 [citado 7 de julio de 2022];12(23). doi: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v12i23.1088
      27. González Castro C, Cruzat Arriagada M. Innovación educativa: la experiencia de las carreras pedagógicas en la Universidad de Los Lagos, Chile. Educación [Internet]. 2019[citado 16 de agosto de 2022];28(55):103-22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18800/educacion.201902.005
      28. UNESCO. Innovación educativa, texto 1 - UNESCO Biblioteca Digital [Internet]. 2016 [citado 7 de julio de 2022]. Disponible en: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247005
      29. Vargas-Murillo G. Diseño y gestión de entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Cuad Hosp Clínicas [Internet]. 2021 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];62(1):80-7. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1652-67762021000100012&lng=es.
      30. Cruz CEZ, Colado AZ, Ocegueda ATS, Escobedo RMV. Análisis crítico de ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje. Utopía Prax Latinoam [Internet]. 2020 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];25(Esp.11):33-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4278319
      31. Núñez-Cortés JM, Reussi R, García Dieguez M, Falasco S. COVID-19 y la educación médica, una mirada hacia el futuro. Foro Iberoamericano de Educación Médica (FIAEM). Educ Médica [Internet]. 2020 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];21(4):251-8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2020.06.004
      32. Avendaño WR, Luna HO, Rueda G, Avendaño WR, Luna HO, Rueda G. Educación virtual en tiempos de COVID-19: percepciones de estudiantes universitarios. Form Univ [Internet]. 2021 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];14(5):119-28. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062021000500119
      33. Canaza-Choque FA. Educación superior en la cuarentena global: disrupciones y transiciones. Rev Digit Investig en Docencia Univ [Internet]. 2020 [citado 7 de julio de 2022];14(2). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2223-25162020000200010&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
      34. Abreu-Hernández LF, León-Bórquez R, García-Gutiérrez JF, Abreu-Hernández LF, León-Bórquez R, García-Gutiérrez JF. Pandemia de COVID-19 y educación médica en Latinoamérica. FEM Rev Fund Educ Médica [Internet]. 2020 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];23(5):237-42. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.33588/fem.235.1088
      35. Bartoletti-Stella A, Gatta V, Mariani GA, Gobbi P, Falconi M, Manzoli L, et al. Three-Dimensional Virtual Anatomy as a New Approach for Medical Student’s Learning. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];18(24):13247. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413247
      36. Kok YY, Er HM, Nadarajah VD. An Analysis of Health Science Students’ Preparedness and Perception of Interactive Virtual Laboratory Simulation. Med Sci Educ [Internet]. 2021 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];31(6):1919-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01364-1
      37. Stephen T, King K, Taylor M, Jackson M, Hilario C. A Virtual, Simulated Code White for Undergraduate Nursing Students. Can J Nurs Res Rev Can Rech en Sci Infirm [Internet]. 2022 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];8445621221101290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/08445621221101290
      38. Wijeysingha ES, Chin VY, Lian CP. Utilising virtual environments for radiation therapy teaching and learning. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci [Internet]. 2021 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];52(4S):S83-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2021.07.001
      39. Ben Hamida E, Ayadi I, Marrakchi Z, Quinton A. The script concordance test as a tool to evaluate clinical reasoning in neonatology. Tunis Med [Internet]. 2017 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];95(5):326-30. Disponible en: https://www.latunisiemedicale.com/article-medicale-tunisie.php?article=3234
      40. Cobb KA, Brown G, Hammond R, Mossop LH. Students’ perceptions of the Script Concordance Test and its impact on their learning behavior: a mixed methods study. J Vet Med Educ [Internet]. 2015 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];42(1):45-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0514-057r1
      41. Roberti A, Roberti M do RF, Pereira ERS, Costa NM da SC. Script concordance test in medical schools in Brazil: possibilities and limitations. Sao Paulo Med J Rev Paul Med [Internet]. 2016 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];134(2):116-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2015.00100108
      42. Hornos EH, Pleguezuelos EM, Brailovsky CA, Harillo LD, Dory V, Charlin B. The practicum script concordance test: an online continuing professional development format to foster reflection on clinical practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof [Internet]. 2013 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];33(1):59-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.21166
      43. Kania RE, Verillaud B, Tran H, Gagnon R, Kazitani D, Huy PTB, et al. Online script concordance test for clinical reasoning assessment in otorhinolaryngology: the association between performance and clinical experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2011 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];137(8):751-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2011.106
      44. Sibert L, Darmoni SJ, Dahamna B, Hellot MF, Weber J, Charlin B. Online clinical reasoning assessment with Script Concordance test in urology: results of a French pilot study. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2006 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];6:45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-45
      45. Vital S, Wulfman C, Girard F, Tamimi F, Charlin B, Ducret M. Script concordance tests: A call for action in dental education. Eur J Dent Educ Off J Assoc Dent Educ Eur [Internet]. 2021 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];25(4):705-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12649
      46. Fundación Practicum. Practicum Script - The Simulator for the training of clinical reasoning [Internet]. 2022 [citado 7 de julio de 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.practicumscript.education/en_en/practicum-script-simulator-training-reasoning-clinic
      47. Orellana AM, Oyarzún-Díaz PA, Briones-Rojas C, Vidal-Silva CL. Prototipo de simulador de audiometría para estudiantes de fonoaudiología de la Universidad Santo Tomás, Chile. Form Univ [Internet]. 2020 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];13(2):3-10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062020000200003
      48. Connor N. Voice Disorders: Simulations Home Page [Internet]. Voice Disorders: Simulations. Resources for Teaching & Learning. 2020 [citado 5 de agosto de 2022]. Disponible en: https://slpsims.csd.wisc.edu/
      49. Naz R, Khan MNA, Aamir M. Scrum-Based Methodology for Product Maintenance and Support. International Journal of Engineering and Manufacturing (IJEM) [Internet]. 2016;6(1):10-27. doi: https://www.mecs-press.org/ijem/v6n1.html
      50. Castro-Rivera VP, Herrera-Acuña RA, Villalobos-Abarca MA, Castro-Rivera VP, Herrera-Acuña RA, Villalobos-Abarca MA. Development of a web software to generate management plans of software risks. Inf Tecnológica [Internet]. 2020 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];31(3):135-48. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642020000300135
      51. Chávez Arellano R, Pineda Domínguez D, Cuadrado Gallego JJ, Chávez Arellano R, Pineda Domínguez D, Cuadrado Gallego JJ. Eficiencia de proyectos de desarrollo de software y modelos de conversión de funcionalidad. Investig Adm [Internet]. 2014 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];43(113):45-59. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-76782014000100045&lng=es&tlng=es.
      52. Jústiz-Núñez D, Gómez-Suárez D, Delgado-Dapena MD. Proceso de pruebas para productos de software en un laboratorio de calidad. Ing Ind [Internet]. 2014 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];35(2):131-45. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1815-59362014000200003&lng=es&tlng=es.
      53. Romero S, Romero O, Muñoz D. Introducción a la Ingeniería. 2a. Ed. Dr. Sergio Romero Hernández, Dr. Omar Romero Hernández et al by Cengage - Issuu [Internet]. 2a. CENGAGE Learning; 2015 [citado 1 de junio de 2022]. Disponible en: https://issuu.com/cengagelatam/docs/romero_issuu
      54. Marks B, Thomas J. Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory. Educ Inf Technol [Internet]. 2022 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];27(1):1287-305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10653-6
      55. Ryan GV, Callaghan S, Rafferty A, Higgins MF, Mangina E, McAuliffe F. Learning Outcomes of Immersive Technologies in Health Care Student Education: Systematic Review of the Literature. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2022 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];24(2):e30082. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/30082
      56. Al-Balas M, Al-Balas HI, Jaber HM, Obeidat K, Al-Balas H, Aborajooh EA, et al. Distance learning in clinical medical education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: current situation, challenges, and perspectives. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2020 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];20(1):341. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02257-4
      57. Kyle BN, Corral I, John NJ, Shelton PG. Educational Scholarship and Technology: Resources for a Changing Undergraduate Medical Education Curriculum. Psychiatr Q [Internet]. 2017 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];88(2):249-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-016-9474-7
      58. Smart D, Ross K, Carollo S, Williams-Gilbert W. Contextualizing Instructional Technology to the Demands of Nursing Education. Comput Inform Nurs CIN [Internet]. 2020 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];38(1):18-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/cin.0000000000000565
      59. Turan N, Güven Özdemir N, Çulha Y, Özdemir Aydın G, Kaya H, Aştı T. The effect of undergraduate nursing students’ e-Health literacy on healthy lifestyle behaviour. Glob Health Promot [Internet]. 2021 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];28(3):6-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975920960442
      60. Hauze SW, Hoyt HH, Frazee JP, Greiner PA, Marshall JM. Enhancing Nursing Education Through Affordable and Realistic Holographic Mixed Reality: The Virtual Standardized Patient for Clinical Simulation. Adv Exp Med Biol [Internet]. 2019 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];1120:1-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06070-1_1
      61. Huang TK, Yang CH, Hsieh YH, Wang JC, Hung CC. Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) applied in dentistry. Kaohsiung J Med Sci [Internet]. 2018 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];34(4):243-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.009
      62. Brown MA, Alshiraihi I, Hassell K, Lanning S. Clinical Sciences-Leading the Way in Competency-Based Biomedical Education. Vet Sci [Internet]. 2020 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];7(1):E23. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7010023
      63. Regmi K, Jones L. A systematic review of the factors - enablers and barriers - affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2020 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];20(1):91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6
      64. Charlin B, Roy L, Brailovsky C, Goulet F, van der Vleuten C. The Script Concordance test: a tool to assess the reflective clinician. Teach Learn Med [Internet]. 2000 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];12(4):189-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328015tlm1204_5
      65. Mathieu S, Couderc M, Glace B, Tournadre A, Malochet-Guinamand S, Pereira B, et al. Construction and utilization of a script concordance test as an assessment tool for dcem3 (5th year) medical students in rheumatology. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2013 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];13:166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-166
      66. Hamui M, Ferreira JP, Torrents M, Torres F, Ibarra M, Ossorio MF, et al. Script Concordance Test: first nationwide experience in pediatrics. Arch Argent Pediatr [Internet]. 2018 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];116(1):e151-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.5546/aap.2018.e151
      67. Kün-Darbois JD, Annweiler C, Lerolle N, Lebdai S. Script concordance test acceptability and utility for assessing medical students’ clinical reasoning: a user’s survey and an institutional prospective evaluation of students’ scores. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2022 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];22(1):277. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03339-1
      68. Deshpande S, Chahande J, Rathi A. Mobile learning app: A novel method to teach clinical decision making in prosthodontics. Educ Health Abingdon Engl [Internet]. 2017 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];30(1):31-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6283.210514
      69. Hardavella G, Aamli-Gaagnat A, Saad N, Rousalova I, Sreter KB. How to give and receive feedback effectively. Breathe [Internet]. 2017 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];13(4):327-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.009917
      70. Tuma F, Nassar A k. Feedback in Medical Education. En: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 [citado 12 de julio de 2022]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544311/
      71. Peyrony O, Hutin A, Truchot J, Borie R, Calvet D, Albaladejo A, et al. Impact of panelists’ experience on script concordance test scores of medical students. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2020 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];20(1):313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02243-w
      72. Kim TH, Kim JS, Yoon HI, Lee J, Lee JJB, Byun HK, et al. Medical student education through flipped learning and virtual rotations in radiation oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross sectional research. Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2021[citado 16 de agosto de 2022];16(1):204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01927-x
      73. Sadeghi AH, Peek JJ, Max SA, Smit LL, Martina BG, Rosalia RA, et al. Virtual Reality Simulation Training for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation After Cardiac Surgery: Face and Content Validity Study. JMIR Serious Games [Internet]. 2022 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];10(1):e30456. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/30456
      74. Young ME, Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Gordon D, Gruppen LD, Rencic J, et al. Mapping clinical reasoning literature across the health professions: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2020 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];20:107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02012-9
      75. Leclerc AA, Nguyen LHP, Charlin B, Lubarsky S, Ayad T. Assessing the acceptability of script concordance testing: a nationwide study in otolaryngology. Can J Surg [Internet]. 2021 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];64(3):E317-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1503%2Fcjs.014919
      76. Lee SM, Trimi S. Innovation for creating a smart future. J Innov Knowl [Internet]. 2018 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];3(1):1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.11.001
      77. Chouvarda I, Mountford N, Trajkovik V, Loncar-Turukalo T, Cusack T. Leveraging Interdisciplinary Education Toward Securing the Future of Connected Health Research in Europe: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2019 [citado 16 de agosto de 2022];21(11):e14020. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196%2F14020
      Publish with RIICS

      Scimago

      Most read in the last 30 days

      Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |