Creation of various Pediatric Vocal Self-Assessment Questionnaires Worldwide: a Scoping Review

Creación de diversos cuestionarios de autoevaluación vocal pediátrica a nivel mundial: una revisión de alcance

Published 2024-12-16

Open | Download
PDF Icon Flip Icon HTML Icon XML Icon
Issue
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Section
Review Articles
How to Cite
1.
Creation of various Pediatric Vocal Self-Assessment Questionnaires Worldwide: a Scoping Review. Rev. Investig. Innov. Cienc. Salud [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 16 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];7(1):1-23. Available from: https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/319
DOI

https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.319
Dimensions
PlumX
license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Soledad Correa
University of Valparaíso image/svg+xml
Roles:  
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1362-830X
Renata Azevedo
Federal University of São Paulo image/svg+xml
Roles:  
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3757-5687
Millaray Alfaro Bugueño
University of Valparaíso image/svg+xml
Roles:  
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8628-8976
Paula Urbina
University of Valparaíso image/svg+xml
Roles:  
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0088-4117
Alexandra Varas González
University of Valparaíso image/svg+xml
Roles:  
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2384-6177
Show authors biography

Soledad Correa,

1 Escuela de Fonoaudiología; Facultad de Medicina; Universidad de Valparaíso; Viña del Mar; Chile.
2 Escola de Fonoaudiologia; Universidade Federal de São Paulo; São Paulo; Brasil.

Renata Azevedo,

Escola de Fonoaudiologia; Universidade Federal de São Paulo; São Paulo; Brasil.

Millaray Alfaro Bugueño,

Escuela de Fonoaudiología; Facultad de Medicina; Universidad de Valparaíso; Viña del Mar; Chile.

Paula Urbina,

Escuela de Fonoaudiología; Facultad de Medicina; Universidad de Valparaíso; Viña del Mar; Chile.

Alexandra Varas González,

Escuela de Fonoaudiología; Facultad de Medicina; Universidad de Valparaíso; Viña del Mar; Chile.

Valentina Vásquez Castillo,

Escuela de Fonoaudiología; Facultad de Medicina; Universidad de Valparaíso; Viña del Mar; Chile.

Introduction. Childhood dysphonia can affect emotionally, socially and/or academically the infant's life, so it is essential to obtain a complete evaluation at vocal level, considering voice self-assessment.

Objective. To know and describe the characteristics of pediatric vocal self-assessment instruments created worldwide.

Method. A review of the scope was conducted in accordance with the methodologically established search criteria. The data analysis was performed after the search in several scientific database platforms. Twelve articles were incorporated into the final review and, based on the results obtained, 17 vocal self-evaluation questionnaires were described, indicating their evaluation objectives, structural conformation, target population, country of creation, methodological construction and psychometric characteristics.

Results. 17 original vocal self-assessment questionnaires were found, published in Italian, English, Portuguese, and Spanish. The studies considered several vocal pathologies and variable age ranges, including population from 0 to 21 years of age, The sample used was variable, with 3 publications with an experimental group of less than 100 subjects. 4 investigations presented adaptations of questionnaires originally created for adult voice and 2 investigations presented abbreviations of original questionnaires for pediatric voice. Considering the description of psychometric measures, 1 questionnaire presented sensitivity and specificity, 2 questionnaires presented validity and reliability, 4 questionnaires presented only reliability, 6 questionnaires presented specificity, sensitivity, and efficiency, and 4 questionnaires described reliability, validity, specificity, and sensitivity.

Conclusion. 17 original pediatric vocal self-assessment questionnaires were identified and described.

Article visits 121 | PDF visits 1

  1. Gómez Sánchez V. Estudio de la vulnerabilidad de la voz en niños de 8 y 10 años con disfonía infantil [bachelor’s thesis]. [Cantabria]: Universidad de Cantabria; 2015. 27 p. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10902/15618
  2. Fleta Zaragozano J. Disfonía en la infancia. Valoración y pauta a seguir. Boletín de la Sociedad de Pediatría de Aragón, La Rioja y Soria [Internet]. 2021;51(2): 81-5. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8098046
  3. Antón Almero M, Reig Montaner E, Ferrer Ramírez MJ, Doménech Máñez I, Huerta Barberá S, Revenga Nieto G. D. Impacto de la disfonía en la calidad de vida en la edad infantil. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología [Internet]. 2022;42(4): 208-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2021.02.005
  4. Alcaíno Navarrete VP, Bobadilla Mellado PA, Cortés Arellano VE, Pozo Bustamante AA. Cuestionarios que evalúan la calidad de vida relacionada con disfonía en población pediátrica: una revisión sistemática. [bachelor's tesis]. Talca: Universidad de Talca; 2020. 53 p. Available from: http://dspace.utalca.cl/handle/1950/12880
  5. Centeno D, Nercelles L, Valenzuela J, Catalán C. Análisis descriptivo del índice de discapacidad vocal pediátrico en niños con patología vocal benigna. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2022;82(1):16-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-48162022000100016
  6. Malebrán MC, Henríquez L, Contreras-Ruston F. Revisión narrativa de instrumentos de autoevaluación vocal en Chile. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello [Internet]. 2021;81(4):615-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-48162021000400615
  7. Inostroza-Moreno G. Orientaciones filosóficas en la intervención fonoaudiológica de voz. El desafío actual de dar el alta. Rev Investig Innov Cienc Salud [Internet]. 2021;3(1):116-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.34
  8. Chambergo-Michilot D, Diaz-Barrera ME, Benites-Zapata VA. Revisiones de alcance, revisiones paraguas y síntesis enfocada en revisión de mapas: aspectos metodológicos y aplicaciones. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica [Internet]. 2021;38:136-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2021.381.6501
  9. Grant M, Brooth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J [Internet]. 2009;26(2):91-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  10. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ [Internet]. 2021;372:n71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  11. Hartnick CJ. Validation of a pediatric voice quality-of-life instrument: the pediatric voice outcome survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2002;128(8):919-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.128.8.919
  12. Boseley ME, Cunningham MJ, Volk MS, Hartnick CJ. Validation of the pediatric voice-related quality-of-life survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2006;132(7):717-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.132.7.717
  13. Zur KB, Cotton S, Kelchner L, Baker S, Weinrich B, Lee L. Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI): a new tool for evaluating pediatric dysphonia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2007;71(1):77-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.09.004
  14. Cohen JT, Oestreicher-Kedem Y, Fliss DM, DeRowe A. Glottal function index: a predictor of glottal disorders in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Internet]. 2007;116(2):81-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940711600201
  15. Verduyckt I, Morsomme D, Remacle M. Validation and standardization of the Pediatric Voice Symptom Questionnaire: a double-form questionnaire for dysphonic children and their parents. J Voice [Internet]. 2012;26(4):e129-e139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.08.001
  16. Ricci-Maccarini A, De Maio V, Murry T, Schindler A. Development and validation of the children's voice handicap index-10 (CVHI-10). J Voice [Internet]. 2013;27(2):258.e23-258.e28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.10.006
  17. Ricci-Maccarini A, De Maio V, Murry T, Schindler A. Development and validation of the Children's Voice Handicap Index-10 for parents. J Voice [Internet]. 2016;30(1):120-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.10.004
  18. Cohen W, Wynne DM. Parent and child responses to the pediatric voice-related quality-of-life questionnaire. J Voice [Internet]. 2015;29(3):299-303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.08.004
  19. Sanz L, Bau P, Arribas I, Rivera T. Development and validation of a short version of the Spanish pediatric voice handicap index (P-VHI-10). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2016;88:113-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.06.053
  20. Lima L, Behlau M. Pediatric Vocal Symptoms Questionnaire (PVSQ): Four new versions for parental evaluation and self-evaluation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2020;131:109816. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109816
  21. Yağcıoğlu D, Aydınlı FE, Aslan G, Kirazlı MÇ, Köse A, Doğan, N. Development, Validation, and Reliability of the Teacher-Reported Pediatric Voice Handicap Index. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch [Internet]. 2022;53(1):69-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00033
  22. Amir O, Bar-David OY, Goldstein S, Epstein R, Alston M, Roziner I, et al. Development and Validation of the Children’s Voice Questionnaire (CVQ). J Voice [Internet]. Forthcoming 2023 Oct 31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.09.030
  23. Bach KK, Belafsky PC, Wasylik K, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the glottal function index. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2005;131(11):961-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.11.961
  24. Crevier Buchman L, Mattei A, Giovanni A. Uso forzado de la voz. EMC-Otorrinolaringología [Internet]. 2020;49(1):1-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1632-3475(19)43324-9
  25. Batista GKS, Simões-Zenari M, Nemr K. Cut-off point for high dysphonia risk in children based on the Child Dysphonia Risk Screening Protocol: preliminary findings. Clinics (Sao Paulo) [Internet]. 2020;75:e1682. doi: https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1682
  26. Nemr NK, Simões-Zenari M, Lobrigate KE. Proposal for pediatric population dysphonic screening protocol. 42nd Annual Symposium: Care of the Professional Voice; 2013 May 29 - Jun 2; Philadelphia: The Voice Foundation.
  27. Carvajal A, Centeno C, Watson R, Martínez M, Sanz Rubiales Á. ¿Cómo validar un instrumento de medida de la salud? An sist sanit Navar [Internet]. 2011;34(1):63-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272011000100007
  28. Jiménez González MA, Aguilera Ramírez M, Morales Vázquez E. El aprendizaje de Inglés como Segunda Lengua mediante la traducción bidireccional. Cienc lat [Internet]. 2023;7(2):3594-619. doi: https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i2.5601
  29. Manterola C, Otzen T. Porqué investigar y cómo conducir una investigación. Int J Morphol [Internet]. 2013;31(4):1498-504. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022013000400056
  30. Ministerio de Desarrollo Social y Familia de Chile, Subsecretaría de la Niñez de Chile. Guía Didáctica para la Ley 21.430. Sobre Garantías y Protección Integral de los Derechos de la Niñez y Adolescencia. The World Bank; 2022, 76 p.
  31. Valdés Cuervo ÁA, Carlos Martínez EA, Vera Noriega JÁ, Montoya Verdugo G. Propiedades psicométricas de un instrumento para medir las relaciones familiares en adolescentes intelectualmente sobresalientes. Pensam psicol [Internet]. 2012;10(1), 39-50. Available from: https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/pensamientopsicologico/article/view/209
  32. Luján Tangarife JA, Cardona Arias JA. Construcción y validación de escalas de medición en salud: revisión de propiedades psicométricas. Archivos de Medicina [Internet]. 2015;11(3):1-10. Available from: https://www.itmedicalteam.pl/articles/construccin-y-validacin-de-escalasde-medicin-en-salud-revisin-depropiedades-psicomtricas-103291.html
  33. Argibay JC. Técnicas psicométricas. Cuestiones de validez y confiabilidad. Subj procesos cogn [Internet]. 2006;(8):15-33. Available from: http://dspace.uces.edu.ar:8180/xmlui/handle/123456789/765
  34. Rosario-Rodríguez A, Rodríguez-Montalbán R, Martínez-Lugo M. Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Comportamientos de Ciudadanía Organizacional (ECCO). Rev Puertorriquena Psicol [Internet]. 2019;30(1):30-46. Available from: https://www.repsasppr.net/index.php/reps/article/view/393
Publish with RIICS

Scimago

Most read in the last 30 days

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |