Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Impact of an 8 and 12-week Cardiac Rehabilitation Program on the Perception of Quality of Life in Patients with Coronary Angioplasty. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Impacto de la rehabilitación cardiaca de 8 vs 12 semanas sobre la calidad de vida de personas con angioplastia. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado



Open | Download


Section
Research Article

How to Cite
1.
Impact of an 8 and 12-week Cardiac Rehabilitation Program on the Perception of Quality of Life in Patients with Coronary Angioplasty. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Rev. Investig. Innov. Cienc. Salud [Internet]. 2023 Jul. 13 [cited 2024 Dec. 30];5(1):91-102. Available from: https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/151

Dimensions
PlumX
Zully Rocío Rincón Rueda
    Andrea Carolina Carrillo Vásquez
      Karen Tatiana Cepeda Flórez
        Luz Stella Quintero Santos
          Juan Carlos Sánchez-Delgado

            Introduction. The evaluation of quality of life is a health outcome that is commonly associated with the efficacy of treatments derived from patients with coronary artery disease. The literature is unclear regarding the role of cardiac rehabilitation on quality of life in the population undergoing coronary revascularization.

            Aim. To determine if there are differences in perception of health-related quality of life after attending an 8-week cardiac rehabilitation program compared to a 12-week program in people after coronary angioplasty.

            Methods. Randomized controlled clinical trial that included people with coronary angioplasty, who attended a cardiac rehabilitation program, divided in two groups (8 and 12 weeks), who were evaluated through the 8 domains of Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36).

            Results. The sample was made up of 17 people, with an average age of 63.1 ± 6.9 years. When comparing the evaluation before and after treatment in each group, statistical differences were found in the physical-functioning and role-physical in 8 weeks group. Comparation between group show differences in role-emotional.

            Conclusion. The results of the present study did not show differences between the global score on health-related quality of life. However, when comparing the two interventions, the 8-week group showed better values on the role-emotional.


            Article visits 658 | PDF visits 213


            1. Jayaraj J, Davatyan K, Subramanian S, Priya J. Epidemiology of myocardial infarction. Myocard. Infarct. 2019;3(10). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74768
            2. Malik TF, Tivakaran VS. Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty. [Updated 2022 Sep 19]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535417/
            3. Mehra V, Gaalema D, Pakosh M, Grace S. Systematic review of cardiac rehabilitation guidelines: Quality and scope. European journal of preventive cardiology. 2020;27(9):912-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487319878958
            4. Urzúa M. Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud: Elementos conceptuales. Rev. méd. Chile [Internet]. 2010;138(3):358-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872010000300017
            5. Francis T, Kabboul N, Rac V, Mitsakakis N, Pechlivanoglou P, Bielecki J, Krahn, M. The effect of cardiac rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;35(3):352-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2018.11.013
            6. Lourens EC, Baker RA, Krieg BM. Quality of life following cardiac rehabilitation in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;17(1):137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01893-9
            7. Clark AM, King-Shier KM, Spaling MA, Duncan AS, Stone JA, Jaglal SB, et al. Factors influencing participation in cardiac rehabilitation programmes after referral and initial attendance: qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(10):948-59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215513481046
            8. Rangel-Cubillos DM, Vega-Silva AV, Corzo-Vargas YF, Molano-Tordecilla MC, Peñuela-Arévalo YP, Lagos-Peña KM, et al. Examining Facilitators and Barriers to Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence in a Low-Resource Setting in Latin America from Multiple Perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [Internet]. 2022 Feb 9;19(4):1911. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041911
            9. Luz H, Lugo A, Héctor B, García I, Gómez C. Confiabilidad del cuestionario de calidad de vida en salud SF-36 en Medellín, Colombia. Rev fac Nac Salud Pública. 2006;24(2):37-50. Disponible en: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/fnsp/article/view/243
            10. Ramírez R. Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud como medida de resultados en salud: revisión sistemática de la literatura. Revista colombiana de cardiología. 2007;14(4):207-222. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-469040
            11. Carvajalino L, Roncancio M. Programas de prevención y rehabilitación cardiovascular. Texto de medicina física y rehabilitación. Colombia: Ed. Manual Moderno; 2022.
            12. Peixoto TCA, Begot I, Bolzan DW, Machado L, Reis MS, Papa V, et al. Early Exercise-Based Rehabilitation Improves Health-Related Quality of Life and Functional Capacity After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31(3):308–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2014.11.014
            13. Khalife A, Dorri S, Shafiee S. The effect of cardiac rehabilitation on quality of life in patients with acute coronary síndrome. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015;20(5):588-593. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.164504
            14. Wang W, Chair SY, Thompson DR, Twinn S. Effects of home-based rehabilitation on health-related quality of life and psychological status in Chinese patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction. Heart Lung. 2012;41:15–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2011.05.005
            15. Firouzabadi MG, Sherafat A, Vafaeenasab M. Effect of physical activity on the life quality of coronary artery bypass graft patients. J Med Life. 2014 Jun 15;7(2):260-3. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4197492/
            16. Sadeghi M, Izadi A, Mahdi Hadavi M, Rafati Fard M, Roohafza H. Comparison of the effect of 12- and 24-session cardiac rehabilitation on physical, psychosocial and biomedical factors in ischemic heart disease patients. Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation [Internet]. 2020 Feb 14;41(1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hmbci-2019-0023
            17. Hsu C-J, Chen S-Y, Su S, Yang M-C, Lan C, Chou N-K, et al. The Effect of Early Cardiac Rehabilitation on Health-Related Quality of Life among Heart Transplant Recipients and Patients with Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Transplantation Proceedings [Internet]. 2011 Sep;43(7):2714–7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.04.025
            18. McGregor G, Powell R, Kimani P, Underwood M. Does contemporary exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improve quality of life for people with coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2020;10(6):e036089. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036089
            19. Francis T, Kabboul N, Rac V, Mitsakakis N, Pechlivanoglou P, Bielecki J, Krahn M. The effect of cardiac rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;35(3):352-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2018.11.013
            20. Tavella R and Beltrame J. Cardiac rehabilitation may not provide a quality of life benefit in coronary artery disease patients. BMC Health Services Research. 2012;12(406):1-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-406
            21. Candelaria D, Randall S, Ladak L, Gallagher R. Health-related quality of life and exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in contemporary acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Life Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):579-592. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02338-y
            22. Sánchez-Delgado JC, Camargo Sepulveda DC, Cardona Zapata A, Franco MY, Santos LM, Jácome AM, et al. The Effects of Maintenance Cardiac Rehabilitation: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020;40(4):224-244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000520
            23. Mantilla M, Uriana M, Herazo Y. Effects of a 12-week exercise-based program on the quality of life among myocardial revascularization subjects with normal and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Revista Latinoamericana de Hipertensión. 2019;14(4):237-243. Disponible en: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12442/4080
            24. Saeidi M, Mostafavi S, Heidari H, Masoudi S. Effects of a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program on quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. ARYA Atheroscler. 2013;9(3):179-185. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3681279/
            25. Herdy AH, López-Jiménez F, Terzic CP, Milani M, Stein R, Carvalho T, et al. South American Guidelines for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Rehabilitation. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;103(2, suppl 1):1-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.2014S003
            Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |