Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Changes in Voice Quality after a Pure Tone Stimulation (PTS) Program

Cambios en la calidad vocal después de un Programa de Estimulación con Tonos Puros (PTS)



Open | Download


Section
Research Article

How to Cite
1.
Cantor-Cutiva LC, Bottalico P, Codino J, Hunter EJ, Rubin AD, Jackson-Menaldi MC. Changes in Voice Quality after a Pure Tone Stimulation (PTS) Program. Rev. Investig. Innov. Cienc. Salud [Internet]. 2024 Nov. 28 [cited 2025 May 21];7(1):1-15. Available from: https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/325

Dimensions
PlumX

Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva,

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders; The University of Iowa; Iowa City; United States.


Pasquale Bottalico,

Department of Speech and Hearing Science; University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Champaign; Illinois; United States.


Juliana Codino,

Lakeshore Professional Voice Center, Lakeshore Ear, Nose & Throat Center; St Clair Shores; Michigan; United States.


Eric J. Hunter,

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders; The University of Iowa; Iowa City; United States.


Adam D. Rubin,

Lakeshore Professional Voice Center, Lakeshore Ear, Nose & Throat Center; St Clair Shores; Michigan; United States.


Maria Cristina Jackson-Menaldi,

Lakeshore Professional Voice Center, Lakeshore Ear, Nose & Throat Center; St Clair Shores; Michigan; United States.

In Memoriam of Dr. Maria Cristina Jackson-Menaldi
Dr. Maria Cristina Jackson-Menaldi was a steadfast advocate of PTS as an effective technique for treating voice disorders, and our results bear testament to her wisdom. Her enthusiasm was the driving force behind this study. Dr. Jackson-Menaldi dedicated her life to the fields of voice pathology and voice science, and her passion for clinical care, voice research, and education deeply influenced the many individuals she encountered. Although she passed away before the completion of this work, her contributions were invaluable during the design, data collection, and preparation of this manuscript. Dr. Jackson-Menaldi will always be missed by her students, colleagues, friends, and family, all of whom were fortunate to have known such an exceptional woman. We will always remember you, Dr. Menaldi.


Introduction. Auditory feedback allows individuals to monitor their vocal characteristics and adjust to maintain optimal voice quality. One type of auditory stimulation for conversational voice training/therapy is pure tone stimulation. This technique presents binaural auditory stimuli consisting of pure tones separated by half-step intervals to modify the fundamental frequency of the speaking voice and expand the vocal range.

Objectives. This study aimed to characterize detectable changes in voice production following the application of pure tone stimulation (PTS) among speakers with and without voice disorders.

Methods. Data from thirty-nine participants (28 individuals with voice disorders and 11 individuals with normal voices) were analyzed for this study. All participants engaged in binaural PTS exercises. Participants recorded a sustained vowel /a/ before and after the PTS exercises. Multiple acoustic voice parameters were extracted from the sustained vowel samples (fundamental frequency, pitch strength, harmonics-to-noise ratio, and smoothed cepstral peak prominence). Additionally, a visual analogue scale (VAS) interpretation of narrowband (NB) spectrograms was conducted to assess voice quality.

Results. Statistically significant increases in fundamental frequency were found after the PTS exercises, except for males in the normal voices group. Pitch strength increased after the PTS, regardless of gender. Participants also demonstrated an increase in the harmonics-to-noise ratio. VAS ratings of NB spectrograms indicated improvement in voice quality following the program.

Conclusions. Voice changes after performing PTS suggest voice quality improvement, as measured by acoustic analysis of vowel production and qualitative assessment of NB spectrograms among participants with and without voice disorders.


Article visits 192 | PDF visits 86


  1. Howard D, Hunter EJ. 10. Perceptual features in singing. In Welch GF, Howard DM, Nix J, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Singing [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford Academic; 2016. p. 225-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199660773.013.34
  2. Hunter EJ, Švec JG, Titze IR. Comparison of the produced and perceived voice range profiles in untrained and trained classical singers. J Voice [Internet]. 2006;20(4):513-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.009
  3. Burnett TA, Freedland MB, Larson CR, Hain TC. Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. J Acoust Soc Am [Internet]. 1998;103(6):3153-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.423073
  4. Husson R. Physiologie de la phonation. 1st ed. Paris: Masson; 1962. 590 p.
  5. Mürbe D, Pabst F, Hofmann G, Sundberg J. Significance of auditory and kinesthetic feedback to singers' pitch control. J Voice [Internet]. 2002;16(1):44-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00071-1
  6. Sapir S, McClean MD, Larson CR. Human laryngeal responses to auditory stimulation. The J Acoust Soc Am [Internet]. 1983;73(1):315-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.388812
  7. Sapir S. Acoustic and electromyographic analyses of human laryngeal responses to auditory stimulation [Ph.D dissertation]. [Seattle]: University of Washington; 1982.
  8. Udaka J, Kanetake H, Kihara H, Koike Y. Human auditory-laryngeal reflex. The Japan Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics [Internet]. 1989;30(4):360-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.5112/jjlp.30.360
  9. Cantor-Cutiva LC, Codino J, Bottalico P, Hunter EJ, Rubin A, Jackson-Menaldi C. Changes on voice quality after Pure Tone Stimulation. A pilot study. Paper presented at: The Voice Foundation 47th Annual Symposium: Care of the Professional Voice; 2018 May 30-Jun 3; Philadelphia, USA.
  10. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. Bmj [Internet]. 2014;348:g1687. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687
  11. Shrivastav R, Eddins D, Anand S. Pitch strength of normal and dysphonic voices. The J Acoust Soc Am [Internet]. 2012;131(3):2261-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3681937
  12. Kopf LM, Jackson-Menaldi C, Rubin AD, Skeffington J, Hunter EJ, Skowronski MD, et al. Pitch strength as an outcome measure for treatment of dysphonia. J Voice [Internet]. 2017;31(6):691-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.01.016
  13. Ferrand CT. Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio: An Index of Vocal Aging. J Voice [Internet]. 2002;16(4):480-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00123-6
  14. Teixeira JP, Fernandes PO. Jitter, Shimmer and HNR Classification within Gender, Tones and Vowels in Healthy Voices. Procedia Technology [Internet]. 2014;16:1228-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.138
  15. Heman-Ackah YD, Michael DD, Baroody MM, Ostrowski R, Hillenbrand J, Heuer RJ, et al. Cepstral Peak Prominence: A More Reliable Measure of Dysphonia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Internet]. 2003;112(4):324-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940311200406
  16. Kent RD, Read C. The acoustic analysis of speech. 2nd ed. Albany: Singular/Thomson Learning; 2002. 311 p.
  17. Yanagihara N. Significance of harmonic changes and noise components in hoarseness. J Speech Hear Res. 1967;10(3):531-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1003.531
  18. Titze IR. Workshop on acoustic voice analysis. National Center for Voice and Speech; 1994 Feb. p. 1-36.
  19. Sprecher A, Olszewski A, Jiang JJ, Zhang Y. Updating signal typing in voice: addition of type 4 signals. J Acoust Soc Am [Internet]. 2010;127(6):3710-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3397477
  20. Bastilha GR, Pagliarin KC, Cielo CA. Development and evidence of content validity of the Spectrographic Vocal Assessment Protocol (SVAP). J Voice [Internet]. 2021;35(4):512-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.12.008
  21. R Development Core Team. The R Project for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; c2024 [cited 2014 Jan 19]; [about 3 screens]. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/
  22. Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of maximum likelihood principle. In Petrov BN, Caski F, editors. Proceeding of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado; 1973. p. 267-81.
  23. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4 [Internet]. Vienna; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; c2024 [updated 2024 Jul 3; cited 2016 Sep 23]; [about 3 screens]. doi: https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.lme4
  24. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen R. lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed-effects models. [Internet]. Vienna; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; c2024 [updated 2020 Oct 23; cited 2016 Sep 23]; [about 2 screens]. doi: https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.lmerTest
  25. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. multcomp: Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models. [Internet]. Vienna; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; c2024 [updated 2024 Jul 18]; [about 2 screens]. doi: https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.multcomp
  26. Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and psychological measurement [Internet]. 1973;33(3):613-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447303300309
  27. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics [Internet]. 1977;33(1):159-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  28. Alegria R, Freitas SV, Manso MC. Is there an improvement on acoustic voice parameters in patients with bilateral vocal fold nodules after voice therapy? A meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2020;277:2163-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05956-2
  29. Nguyen DD, Kenny DT. Randomized controlled trial of vocal function exercises on muscle tension dysphonia in Vietnamese female teachers. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2009;38(2):261-78. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19442378/
  30. Hofman EC, Dassie-Leite AP, Martins PDN, Pereira EC. Acoustic measurements of CPPS and AVQI pre and post speech therapy. CoDAS [Internet]. 2023;35(6):1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232022136en
  31. Tanner K, Roy N, Ash A, Buder EH. Spectral moments of the long-term average spectrum: sensitive indices of voice change after therapy? J Voice [Internet]. 2005;19(2):211-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.02.005
  32. Lee SH, Lee KC, Ban JH, Lee NH, Jin SM. Vocal analysis related to changes in frequency of pure tone auditory feedback. Yonsei Med J [Internet]. 2008;49(4):610-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2008.49.4.610
  33. Akerlund L. Averages of Sound Pressure Levels and Mean Fundamental Frequencies of Speech in Relation to Phonetograms: Comparison of Nonorganic Dysphoria Patients Before and After Therapy. Acta Otolaryngol [Internet]. 1993;113(1):102-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489309135775
  34. Speyer R, Wieneke GH, van Wijck-Warnaar I, Dejonckere PH. Effects of voice therapy on the voice range profiles of dysphonic patients. J Voice [Internet]. 2003;17(4):544-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1067/S0892-1997(03)00079-1
  35. Anand S, Skowronski MD, Shrivastav R, Eddins DA. Perceptual and quantitative assessment of dysphonia across vowel categories. J Voice [Internet]. 2019;33(4):473-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.12.018
  36. Shama K, Krishna A, Cholayya NU. Study of harmonics-to-noise ratio and critical-band energy spectrum of speech as acoustic indicators of laryngeal and voice pathology. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing. 2006;2007:1–9.
  37. Mansuri B, Torabinezhad F, Jamshidi AA, Dabirmoghadam P, Vasaghi-Gharamaleki B, Ghelichi L. Effects of voice therapy on vocal tract discomfort in muscle tension dysphonia. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2019;31(5):297-304. doi: https://doi.org/10.22038/ijorl.2019.36676.2205
  38. Chhetri SS, Gautam R. Acoustic analysis before and after voice therapy for laryngeal pathology. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) [Internet]. 2015;13(4):323-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v13i4.16831
  39. Lu D, Chen F, Yang H, Yu R, Zhou Q, Zhang X, et al. Changes after voice therapy in acoustic voice analysis of chinese patients with voice disorders. J Voice [Internet]. 2018;32(3):386.e1-386.e9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.05.005
  40. Madill C, Chacon A, Kirby E, Novakovic D, Nguyen DD. Active Ingredients of Voice Therapy for Muscle Tension Voice Disorders: A Retrospective Data Audit. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2021;10(18):1-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184135
  41. Nasrin S, Ali D, Jamshid J, Hamed G, Bashir R, Hamide G. The effects of cricothyroid visor maneuver (cvm) therapy on the voice characteristics of patients with muscular tension dysphonia: a case series study. J Voice [Internet]. 2024;38(5):1250.e1-1250.e9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.02.016
  42. Baken RJ, Orlikoff RF. Clinical measurement of speech and voice. 2nd ed. San Diego: Singular Thomson Learning; 2000. 610 p.
  43. Jackson-Menaldi MCA. La voz normal y patológica. diagnóstico y tratamiento de la patología vocal. 1st ed. Buenos Aires: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2019. 536 p.
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |