Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Assessing Digital Competence Among Health Science Undergraduates: a Critical Analysis

Evaluación de las competencias digitales en estudiantes de ciencias de la salud: un análisis crítico



Open | Download


Section
Research Article

How to Cite
1.
Assessing Digital Competence Among Health Science Undergraduates: a Critical Analysis. Rev. Investig. Innov. Cienc. Salud [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 16 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];7(1):1-18. Available from: https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/349

Dimensions
PlumX

Introduction. Strategic management between the educational realm and technology is possible as long as teachers and students have adequate and timely development of digital competencies. Although current generations are receptive to technology, academic activities that require critical thinking and problem-solving with digital support pose challenges and sometimes difficulties.

Objective. To assess digital competencies in students from various healthcare disciplines through self-perception.

Method. The Questionnaire for Assessing Student Digital Competence in Higher Education was used to gather information from a sample of 186 students in the healthcare field. Subsequent analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics.

Results. The results indicated that, overall, students rated themselves in an intermediate range in terms of digital competence, suggesting a moderate perception of their digital abilities.

Conclusion. Although most students reported having basic digital skills, many perceived challenges when using technology for academic tasks requiring information management, research, critical thinking, creativity, and innovation. Continuously improving students' digital competence and guiding their use of technology to solve complex problems can add significant value in the field of e-health, preparing them to fully leverage the opportunities technology offers in academic and professional settings.


Article visits 24 | PDF visits 14


  1. Hailegebreal S, Sedi TT, Belete S, Mengistu K, Getachew A, Bedada D, et al. Utilization of information and communication technology (ICT) among undergraduate health science students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2022;22(1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03296-9
  2. Lisperguer Soto SE, Calvo MS, Urrejola Contreras GP, Pérez Lizama MÁ. Clinical Reasoning Training based on the analysis of clinical case using a virtual environment. Educ méd [Internet]. 2021;22(3):139-43. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2020.08.002
  3. Urrejola-Contreras GP, Tiscornia-González C. Retroalimentación estudiantil sobre herramientas sincrónicas y asincrónicas empleadas en ciencias de la salud en la pandemia por COVID-19. FEM [Internet]. 2022;25(1):39-44. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.33588/fem.251.1168
  4. Carretero Gomez S, Vuorikari R, Punie Y. DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use [Internet]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017. 48 p. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2760/38842
  5. Oberländer M, Beinicke A, Bipp T. Digital competencies: a review of the literature and applications in the workplace. Computers & Education [Internet]. 2020;146:103752. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103752
  6. Strydom SC, Wessels H, Anley C. Moving beyond the tools: Pre-service teachers’ views on what they value in a digital literacy short course. South African Journal of Childhood Education [Internet]. 2021;11(1):1-11. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v11i1.929
  7. Instefjord E, Munthe E. Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology: an analysis of the emphasis on digital competence in teacher education curricula. Eur J Teach Educ [Internet]. 2016;39(1):77-93. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2015.1100602
  8. Rafi M, JianMing Z, Ahmad K. Technology integration for students’ information and digital literacy education in academic libraries. Information discovery and delivery [Internet]. 2019;47(4):203-17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/idd-07-2019-0049
  9. Cabero-Almenara J, Palacios-Rodríguez A. Marco Europeo de Competencia Digital Docente «DigCompEdu». Traducción y adaptación del cuestionario «DigCompEdu Check-In». EDMETIC [Internet]. 2020;9(1):213-34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v9i1.12462
  10. Reis C, Pessoa T, Gallego-Arrufat MJ. Alfabetización y competencia digital en Educación Superior: una revisión sistemática. REDU [Internet]. 2019;17(1):45-58. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/redu.2019.11274
  11. Grebennikova VM, Nikitina NI, Gardanova ZR, Komarova EV. Students’ Perception of E-Learning based on Media Resources and Readiness during COVID-19. Media Watch [Internet]. 2021;12(2):265-75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15655/mw_2021_v12i2_160151
  12. Gardanova Z, Belaia O, Zuevskaya S, Turkadze K, Strielkowski W. Lessons for medical and health education learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare [Internet]. 2023;11(13):1-23. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131921
  13. Londoño-Velasco E, Montoya Cobo E, García A, Bolaños-Martinez I, Osorio-Roa DM, Isaza Gómez G. Percepción de estudiantes frente a procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje durante pandemia por Covid-19. Educ Educ [Internet]. 2021;24(2):199-217. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/edu.2021.24.2.2
  14. Duarte-Herrera M, Valdes Lozano DE, Montalvo Apolín DE. Estrategias disposicionales y aprendizajes significativos en el aula virtual. Rev Educación [Internet]. 2019;43(2):588-602. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v43i2.34038
  15. Kader MARA, Abd Aziz NN, Zaki SM, Ishak M, Hazudin SF. The effect of technostress on online learning behaviour among undergraduates. MJLI [Internet]. 2022;19(1):183-211. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.7
  16. Pemilia H, Hermawan Y, Widyaningrum B. Student perceptions regarding E-learning during the covid-19 pandemic on the level of technostress. Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani [Internet]. 2023;3(9):2039-49. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v3i9.6058
  17. Almerich G, Díaz-García I, Cebrián-Cifuentes S, Suárez-Rodríguez J. Estructura dimensional de las competencias del siglo XXI en estudiantes universitarios de educación. Relieve [Internet]. 2018;24(1):1-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.24.1.12548
  18. Van Laar E, Van Deursen AJ, Dijk V, Ja Y De Haan J. Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: a systematic literature review. Sage Open [Internet]. 2020;10(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
  19. Vallée A, Blacher J, Cariou A, Sorbets E. Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2020;22(8):e16504. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/16504
  20. Sánchez-Cruzado C, Santiago Campión R, Sánchez-Compaña MT. Teacher digital literacy: The indisputable challenge after COVID-19. Sustainability [Internet]. 2021;13(4):1-29. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13041858
  21. Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos V, Matarranz M, Casado-Aranda LA, Otto A. Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: a systematic literature review. Int J Educ Technol High Educ [Internet]. 2022;19(1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8
  22. Restrepo-Palacio S, Cifuentes Y de MS. Diseño y validación de un instrumento de evaluación de la competencia digital en Educación Superior. Ensaio [Internet]. 2020;28(109):932-61. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-40362020002801877
  23. Ramírez-Armenta MO, García-López RI, Edel-Navarro R. Validación de una escala para medir la competencia digital en estudiantes de posgrado. Form Univ [Internet]. 2021;14(3):115-26. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062021000300115
  24. Amhag L, Hellström L, Stigmar M. Teacher educators’ use of digital tools and needs for digital competence in higher education. JDLTE [Internet]. 2019;35(4):203-20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169
  25. Zhao Y, Pinto Llorente AM, Sánchez Gómez MC. Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Comput Educ [Internet]. 2021;168:104212. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212
  26. Le CN, Le LM, Le LM. Development and validation of digital competence assessment scale for health professions students (DigiCAS-HPS) during post- COVID-19 new normal era Preprints [Internet]. 2023. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20944/preprints202311.0931.v1
  27. Cham KM, Edwards ML, Kruesi L, Celeste T, Hennessey T. Digital preferences and perceptions of students in health professional courses at a leading Australian university: A baseline for improving digital skills and competencies in health graduates. AJET [Internet]. 2021;38(1)69-86. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6622
  28. Mehrvarz M, Heidari E, Farrokhnia M, Noroozi O. The mediating role of digital informal learning in the relationship between student’s digital competence and their academic performance. Computers & Education [Internet]. 2021;167:104184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104184
  29. Guillén-Gámez FD, Gómez-García M, Ruiz-Palmero J. Competencia digital en labores de Investigación: predictores que influyen en función del tipo de universidad y género del profesorado. Pixel-Bit [Internet]. 2024;(69):7-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.99992
  30. Pérez López E, Yuste Tosina R. La competencia digital del profesorado universitario durante la transición a la enseñanza remota de emergencia. RED [Internet]. 2023;23(72):1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.6018/red.540121
  31. Hernández Sampieri R, Fernández Collado C, Baptista Lucio M del P. Metodología de la investigación. 6th ed. Madrid: McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 2014. 600 p.
  32. Kerlinger FN, Lee HB. Foundations of Behavioral Research. 4th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2000. 1008 p.
  33. Levin KA. Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evid Based Den [Internet]. 2006;7(1):24-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400375
  34. Gutiérrez Castillo JJ, Cabero-Almenara J, Estrada-Vidal LI. Diseño y validación de un instrumento de evaluación de la competencia digital del estudiante universitario. Revista Espacios [Internet]. 2017;38(10):1-27. Available from: https://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n10/17381018.html
  35. Rodríguez-Moreno J, Ortiz-Colón AM, Cordón-Pozo E, Agreda-Montoro M. The influence of digital tools and social networks on the Digital Competence of university students during COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021;18(6):2-18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062835
  36. Lacka E, Wong TC, Haddoud MY. Can digital technologies improve students’ efficiency? Exploring the role of Virtual Learning Environment and Social Media use in Higher Education. Computers & Education [Internet]. 2021;163:104099. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104099
  37. Vate-U-Lan P. Psychological impact of e-learning on social network sites: online students’ attitudes and their satisfaction with life. JCHE [Internet]. 2020;32(1):27-40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09222-1
  38. Bergdahl N, Nouri J, Fors U. Disengagement, engagement and digital skills in technology-enhanced learning. Education and information technologies [Internet]. 2020;25:957-83. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09998-w
  39. Massieu Paulin A, Díaz Barriga Arceo F. Videos educativos en YouTube: una herramienta promotora de habilidades clínicas en estudiantes de medicina. Educ méd [Internet]. 2021;22(Suppl 4):277-82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2020.03.001
  40. Almobarraz A. Utilization of YouTube as an information resource to support university courses. The electronic library [Internet]. 2018;36(1):71-81. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/el-04-2016-0087
  41. Hershkovizt A, Forkosh-Baruch A. La relación profesor-alumno y la comunicación en Facebook: percepciones de los alumnos. Comunicar [Internet]. 2017;25(53):91-101. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/c53-2017-09
  42. López-Meneses E, Sirignano FM, Vázquez-Cano E, Ramírez-Hurtado JM. University students’ digital competence in three areas of the DigCom 2.1 model: A comparative study at three European universities. Australasian journal of educational technology [Internet]. 2020;36(3):69-88. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5583
  43. Jimenez G, Spinazze P, Matchar D, Koh Choon Huat G, van der Kleij RMJJ, Chavannes NH, et al. Digital health competencies for primary healthcare professionals: A scoping review. Int J Med Inform [Internet]. 2020;143:104260. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104260
  44. Machleid F, Kaczmarczyk R, Johann D, Balčiūnas J, Atienza-Carbonell B, von Maltzahn F, et al. Perceptions of digital health education among European medical students: Mixed methods survey. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2020;22(8):e19827. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19827
  45. Rodríguez Suárez J, Rey Galán C, Riaño Galán I, Díaz Martín JJ, Muñoz Fernández L, Bazó Canelón C. Nuevos retos en la formación sanitaria especializada relacionados con competencias en telemedicina y tecnologías de la información y comunicación. Educ méd [Internet]. 2024;25(1):100878. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2023.100878
  46. Fernández-Batanero JM, Román-Graván P, Montenegro-Rueda M, López-Meneses E, Fernández-Cerero J. Digital teaching competence in higher education: A Systematic review. Educ Sci (Basel) [Internet]. 2021;11(11):1-10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110689
  47. Arslantas TK, Yaylacı ME, Özkaya M. Association between digital literacy, internet addiction, and cyberloafing among higher education students: A structural equation modeling. E-Learning and digital media [Internet]. 2024;21(4):310-28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20427530231156180
  48. Tejedor S, Cervi L, Pérez-Escoda A, Jumbo FT. Digital literacy and higher education during COVID-19 lockdown: Spain, Italy, and Ecuador. Publications [Internet]. 2020;8(4):1-17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications8040048
  49. Nikou S, Aavakare M. An assessment of the interplay between literacy and digital Technology in Higher Education. Education and information technologies [Internet]. 2021;26:3893-915. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10451-0
  50. Anthonysamy L, Koo AC, Hew SH. Self-regulated learning strategies in higher education: Fostering digital literacy for sustainable lifelong learning. Education and information technologies [Internet]. 2020;25:2393-414. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10201-8
  51. Montero Delgado JA, Merino Alonso FJ, Monte Boquet E, Ávila de Tomás JF, Cepeda Díez JM. Competencias digitales clave de los profesionales sanitarios. Educación Médica [Internet]. 2020;21(5):338-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2019.02.010
  52. Rodríguez Suárez J, Rey Galán C, Riaño Galán I, Díaz Martín JJ, Muñoz Fernández L, Bazó Canelón C. Nuevos retos en la formación sanitaria especializada relacionados con competencias en telemedicina y tecnologías de la información y comunicación. Educación Médica [Internet]. 2024;25(1):100878. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2023.100878
  53. Martínez Navarro JA. La competencia digital de los estudiantes universitarios latinoamericanos. Ijeri [Internet]. 2020;(14):276-89. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.4387
  54. Guillén-Gámez FD, Mayorga-Fernández MJ. Quantitative-comparative research on digital competence in students, graduates and professors of faculty education: an analysis with ANOVA. Education and Information Technologies [Internet]. 2020;25:4157-74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10160-0
  55. Engel O, Zimmer LM, Lörz M, Mayweg-Paus E. Digital studying in times of COVID-19: teacher-and student-related aspects of learning success in german higher education. Int J Educ Technol High Educ [Internet]. 2023;20(1):12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00382-w
  56. Tondeur J, Howard S, Van Zanten M, Gorissen P, Van der Neut I, Uerz D, et al. The HeDiCom framework: Higher Education teachers’ digital competencies for the future. Educ Technol Res Dev [Internet]. 2023;71:33-53. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10193-5
  57. Mattar J, Ramos DK, Lucas MR. DigComp-based digital competence assessment tools: Literature review and instrument analysis. Educ Inf Technol [Internet]. 2022;27:10843-67. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11034-3
  58. Sillat LH, Tammets K, Laanpere M. Digital competence assessment methods in higher education: A systematic literature review. Educ Sci (Basel) [Internet]. 2021;11(8):1-13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080402
  59. Gómez-García G, Hinojo-Lucena F-J, Cáceres-Reche M-P, Ramos Navas-Parejo M. The contribution of the Flipped Classroom method to the development of information literacy: A systematic review. Sustainability [Internet]. 2020;12(18):1-13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12187273
  60. Macedo BSP, Yamaguchi MU, Santos ER dos, Dias KM, Aprile DCB, Lopes CT. Letramento digital em saúde de estudantes de enfermagem ou medicina: fatores relacionados. Acta Paul Enferm [Internet]. 2022;35:eAPE02647. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2022ao02647
  61. Van Kessel R, Wong BLH, Clemens T, Brand H. Digital health literacy as a super determinant of health: More than simply the sum of its parts. Internet Interv [Internet]. 2022;27:100500. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2022.100500
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |