Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Dermatoglyphics as a means of finding diabetes mellitus: a systematic review

Dermatoglifia como medio de hallazgo de diabetes mellitus: revisión sistemática



Open | Download


Section
Review Articles

How to Cite
1.
Dermatoglyphics as a means of finding diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Rev. Investig. Innov. Cienc. Salud [Internet]. 2022 Dec. 10 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];4(2):121-36. Available from: https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/141

Dimensions
PlumX
Laura Elizabeth Castro Jiménez
    Nicolas Esteban Buitrago Hernandez
      Angélica Alexandra Buriticá López
        Santiago Becerra Garzón
          Luisa Fernanda Susa Gómez

            Introduction. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases, being one of the main causes of mortality in the world population. Dermatoglyphics is used as an instrument for the discovery of certain biological aspects in different populations.

            Objective. To recognize, by doing a systematic review, the relevance of dermatoglyphics as a means of finding diabetes mellitus.

            Methodology. Review of scientific literature in databases such as Sciencedirect, PubMed, Scopus, and VHL, in which information was extracted after running the search equation with MESH terms. After that, they were revised to include those articles related to DM and dermatoglyphics. For the entire process, the PRISMA methodology was followed, evaluating the articles with the Cochrane bias scale and the level of evidence and recommendation with the SIGN scale.

            Results. After a review of 475 articles, eight articles were included, and when evaluated, five articles were classified as 2+ and three as 2-, with a level D recommendation.

            Conclusion. Dermatoglyphics is a useful tool as a means of detecting DM. However, it is necessary to carry out cohort studies to demonstrate this in different populations, such as the Colombian population. 70% of the reviewed articles show that the prediction of DM finding is effective. Nevertheless, 30% of the investigations within this review do not consider it to be a sufficiently optimal tool to discover the pathology in the population.


            Article visits 743 | PDF visits 232


            1. Jaimes-Castillo MY, Quiroz-Bornachera ME, Seguanes-Díaz C. Impacto del alto costo relacionado con la diabetes Mellitus en el sistema de salud en Colombia. REDIIS [Internet]. 2019;2:82-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.23850/rediis.v2i0.2079
            2. Wiebe JC, Wägner AM, Novoa-Mogollón FJ. Genética de la diabetes mellitus. Nefrología. [Internet] 2011;2(1):111-119. Disponible en: https://www.revistanefrologia.com/es-genetica-diabetes-mellitus-articulo-X2013757511002452
            3. Cortizo A. Enfermedades metabólicas hereditarias [Internet]. Argentina: Editorial de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata; 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.35537/10915/115948
            4. Reynoso L, Escoto M, Camacho EJ, Bravo MC, Becerra AL, Ordaz MI. Estilos de vida y prevención de riesgos a la salud (hipertensión y diabetes) en universitarios. En: Padilla MA, Galán S, Camacho E, Zárate A. Investigación en Psicología básica y aplicada: avances y perspectivas [Internet]. México: Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí; 2016. Disponible en: http://148.215.1.182/handle/20.500.11799/65260
            5. Alberti G, Zimmet P, Shaw J, Bloomgarden Z, Kaufman F, Silink M. Type 2 Diabetes in the young: The evolving epidemic. Diabetes Care [Internet]. 2004;27(7):1798-1811. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.7.1798
            6. Kumar M, Sharma H. Dermatoglyphics: A diagnostic tool to predict diabetes. J. Clin. Diagnostic Res [Internet]. 2012;6(3):327-332. doi: Disponible en: https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/2059/3551_(C)_F(T)_PF(V)_PFA(A)_P(_).pdf
            7. Frenk Baron P, Márquez E. Diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en niños y adolescentes. Med Int Mex. [Internet]. 2010;26(1):36-47. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/medintmex/mim-2010/mim101g.pdf
            8. Rodríguez-Weber FL. Medio ambiente, contaminación y diabetes: ¿son especulaciones? Med Int Méx [Internet]. 2016;32(5):576-579. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/medintmex/mim-2016/mim165j.pdf
            9. Naya LD, Álvarez ED. Diabetes mellitus. Criterios diagnósticos y clasificación. Epidemiología. Etiopatogenia. Evaluación inicial del paciente con diabetes. Medicine-Programa de Formación Médica Continuada Acreditado [Internet]. 2016;12(17):935-946. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.med.2016.09.001
            10. Ziegler A, Mathies R, Ziegelmayer G, Baumgartl H, Rodewald A, Chopra V, Standl E. Dermatoglyphics in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med [Internet]. 1993;10(8):720-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.1993.tb00154.x
            11. Conget J. Diagnóstico, clasificación y patogenia de la diabetes mellitus. Rev Esp Cardiol [Internet]. 2002;55(5):528-538. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-8932(02)76646-3
            12. Barrera M, Pinilla A. Prevención en diabetes mellitus y riesgo cardiovascular: enfoque médico y nutricional. Rev. Fac. Med. [Internet]. 2018;66(3):459-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v66n3.60060
            13. Mušanović J, Metović A, Husremović F, Bejić S, Hasković A, Babić A, et al. Digital dermatoglyphics in the evaluation of the genetic basis of breast cancer in Bosnian-Herzegovinian population - quantitative analysis. Medicinski Glasnik [Internet]. 2020 Aug;17(2):1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.17392/1041-20
            14. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Informe mundial sobre la diabetes. Ginebra: Organización Mundial de la Salud [Internet]; 2016. Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254649/9789243565255-spa.pdf
            15. López-Ramón C, Ávalos-García M. Diabetes mellitus hacia una perspectiva social. RCSP [Internet]. 2016;39(2):331-345. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/revcubsalpub/csp-2013/csp132m.pdf
            16. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Libro de memorias extenso. 1era. ed. California, México: Universidad Autónoma de Baja California; 2015.
            17. El-Sayed A, Koenen K, Galea S. Rethinking our public health genetics research paradigm. Am J Public Health [Internet]. 2013;103(1):14-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301127
            18. Morris M, Ludwar B, Swingle E, Mamo M, Shubrook J. A new method to assess asymmetry in fingerprints could be used as an early indicator of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. diabetes Sci. Technol [Internet]. 2016;10(4):864–871. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816629984
            19. Aljoe R, Garcia D, Gastélum G. Perfil dermatoglífico y somatotipificación de jugadores adolescentes de fútbol. Retos. 2016;36:32-36. Disponible en: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1177/42e89981f9eb7ac4bf179c4d0c8fe776c960.pdf
            20. Morrizon G, Aspillage M. Los dermatoglifos. Scielo [Internet]. 1997;(1):218-277. Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rcp/v48n4/art03.pdf
            21. Suarez J. Dermatoglifia dactilar, fuerza y composición corporal en un grupo de jugadores colombianos de fútbol profesional retirados [tesis pregrado]. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales; 2020. Disponible en: https://repository.udca.edu.co/handle/11158/3709
            22. Aljoe R, Garcia D, Gastélum G. (2020). La dermatoglifia deportiva en América en la última década: una revisión sistemática. Retos [Internet]. 2020;1(38):1579-1726. doi: https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v38i38.76459
            23. Machado JF, Roquetti Fernandes P, Fernandes Filho J. Relação da qualidade física de força de preensão de mão com a quantidade de linhas dermatoglíficas: um estudo preliminar da predisposição genética. Fitness & Performance Journal [Internet]. 2010;9(1):100-105. Recuperado de: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=75118600014
            24. Fernández R, García D, Gastélum G. La dermatoglifia deportiva en América en la última década una revisión sistemática. Retos [Internet]. 2020;2(38):831-837. doi: https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v38i38.76459
            25. Vera M, Cabrera E, Guell R. Dermatoglyphics in insulin-dependent diabetic patients with limited joint mobility. Acta Diabetol [Internet]. 1995;32:78-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00569561
            26. Ñapoles E, Martinez P. Dermatoglifos, una ayuda diagnóstica en la enfermedad ulceropéptica. Rev Cubana Med [Internet]. 1984;23(5):546-553. Disponible en: http://revmedicina.sld.cu/index.php/med/article/view/2074
            27. Padrón-Duran R, Hung-Llamos S, Güell-González R, Arce-Hidalgo B. Estudio citogenético y de los dermatoglifos de la aplasia germinal. Rev Cubana Med [Internet]. 1978;17(3):381-388. Disponible en: http://revmedicina.sld.cu/index.php/med/article/view/1203
            28. Bala A, Deswal A, Sarmah P, Khandalwal B, Tamag B. Palmar dermatoglyphics patterns in diabetes mellitus and diabetic with hypertension patients in Gangtok region. Int. J. Adv. Res [Internet]. 2015;3(4):1117-1125. Disponible en: http://journalijar.com/uploads/808_IJAR-5602.pdf
            29. Montoya-Monroy JS, Castro-Jiménez LE, Melo-Buitrago PJ, Argüello-Gutiérrez YP. Dermatoglifia dactilar y su relación con el consumo máximo de oxígeno en integrantes del equipo de voleibol femenino de la Universidad Santo Tomás. Movimiento Científico [Internet]. 2019;13(1):23-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.33881/2011-7191.mct.13103
            30. García C. Diabetes mellitus gestacional. Med Int Mex [Internet]. 2008;24(2):148-156. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/medintmex/mim-2008/mim082h.pdf
            31. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Disponible en: https://es.cochrane.org/sites/es.cochrane.org/files/uploads/Manual_Cochrane_510_reduit.pdf
            32. Manterola C, Asenjo CL, Otzen T. Jerarquización de la evidencia. Niveles de evidencia y grados de recomendación de uso actual. Rev Chilena. [Internet]. 2014;31(6):705-718. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-10182014000600011
            33. Taiwo I, Adebanjo O. Evaluation of association between digital dermatoglyphic traits and type-2 diabetes in Lagos, Nigeria. Nig Qt J Hosp Med [Internet]. 2012;22(3):191-199. Disponible en: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/nqjhm/article/view/113030
            34. Vera M, Cabrera E, Guell R, Hernandez M. Dermatoglyphics in insulin-dependent diabetic children and adolescents with limitation of articular movements (LAM). Rev. cuba. pediatr. [Internet]. 1989;61(1):86-93. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-80961
            35. Nadeem J, Radhika T, Sai L, Khodabux R, Srilekha R, Sruthi G. Cheiloscopy and dermatoglyphics as screening tools for type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Forensic Dent Sci. [Internet]. 2019;11(3):163–166. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7398358/
            36. Jeergal PA, Pandit S, Desai D, Surekha R, Jeergal VA. Morphological patterns of lip prints in Mangaloreans based on Suzuki and Tsuchihashi classification. JOMFP [Internet]. 2016;20(2):320-327. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-029X.185896
            37. Suzuki K, Tsuchihashi Y. New attempt of personal identification by means of lip print. J. Indian Dent. Assoc. [Internet]. 1970;42(1):8-9. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5269498/
            38. Manjusha P, Sudha S, Shameena P, Chandni R, Varma S, Deepak P. Analysis of lip print and fingerprint patterns in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Forensic Corner. [internet]. 2017;21(2):309-315. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_17_16
            39. Khan H, Graff M, Stein A, Lumey L. A fingerprint marker from early gestation associated with diabetes in middle age: The Dutch hunger Winter Families Study. Int J Epidemiol [Internet]. 2009 [Consultado 2021 Ago 16]; 38(1): 101-109. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn158
            40. Crizón D, Morales C. Manifestaciones dermatológicas de la diabetes: clasificación y diagnóstico. Iatreia [Internet]. 2020;33(3):239-250. doi: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iatreia.58
            41. Andrew T, Ong T, David N, Sek Y. Automatic fingerprint center point determination by using modified directional field and morphology. In: Gedeon T, Fung LCC, editores. AI 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2903. Berlin: Springer; 2003. p. 633-640. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24581-0_54
            42. Escobar JM, Escobar M. Diabetes y depresión. Acta Med Colomb [Internet]. 2016;41(2):11-97. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/amc/v41n2/0120-2448-amc-41-02-00096.pdf
            43. Mehta AA, Mehta A. Study of fingerprint patterns in type II Diabetes Mellitus. Int. j. anat. physiol. [Internet]. 2015;3(2):1046-1048. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2015.155
            44. Vera M, Shumkou G, Güell R. Cambio histológico e histoquímico en la piel de pacientes diabéticos insulinodependientes. Rev. cuba. med [Internet]. 1987;26(2):125-133. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-52346
            45. Umana U, Bello R, Timbuak J, Ibegbu A, Musa S, Ikyembe D, Hamman W. Dermatoglyphic and cheiloscopic patterns among diabetic patients: A study in Ahmnadu Bello University Teaching Hospital Zaria, Nigeria. Online J. Biol. Sci [Internet]. 2013;4(2):206-214. doi: https://doi.org/10.5296/jbls.v4i2.3399
            46. Sudagar M, Radha K, Duraipandian K, Sundaravadhanam K. Study of palmar patterns in diabetic patients. Int. j. adv. Med. [Internet]. 2014;1(2):117-122. doi: https://doi.org/10.5455/2349-3933.ijam20140820
            47. Mannino D, Thorn D, Swensen A, Holguin F. Prevalence and outcomes of diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease in COPD. Eur Respir J [Internet]. 2008;32:962-969. doi: https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00012408
            48. Gastélum G, Guedea J. Potencial de la dermatoglifia en las ciencias del deporte y la salud en México. Salud y deporte [Internet]. 2017;11(3):108-114. Disponible en: https://vocero.uach.mx/index.php/tecnociencia/article/view/84
            49. Leiva J, Melo P, Gil M. Dermatoglifia dactilar, orientación y selección deportiva. REVCGJMC [Internet]. 2011;9(9):287-300. doi: https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.256
            50. Abad-Colil A, Hernández-Mosqueira C, Fernandes-Filho J. Dermatoglifia, fuerza máxima y rendimiento ergométrico en seleccionados chilenos de remo. Rev horiz cienc act fis [Internet]. 2015;6(1):7-13. Disponible en: http://www.revistahorizonte.ulagos.cl/index.php/horizonte/article/view/153
            51. Guerra F. Perfil dermatoglífico como alternativa para la selección de futuros talentos deportivos [Internet]. Bucaramanga: Universidad cooperativa de Colombia; 2020. Disponible en: https://repository.ucc.edu.co/handle/20.500.12494/19874
            52. Feroz J, Rubeena N. Variatios of dermatoglyphic features in non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Int. j. recent trends sci. [Internet]. 2013;8(1):16-19. Disponible en: https://statperson.com/Journal/ScienceAndTechnology/Article/Volume8Issue1/8_1_6.pdf
            53. Fuller I. Dermatoglyphics: A Diagnostic Aid? J. Med. Genet. [Internet]. 1973;10:165-169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.10.2.165
            Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |