Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Evaluación en línea de habilidades auditivas en la tercera edad: consideraciones iniciales

Online Auditory Abilities Screening in Elderly: Initial Considerations



Abrir | Descargar


Sección
Artículos de investigación

Cómo citar
1.
Evaluación en línea de habilidades auditivas en la tercera edad: consideraciones iniciales. Rev. Investig. Innov. Cienc. Salud [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 16 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];7(1):1-13. Available from: https://riics.info/index.php/RCMC/article/view/311

Dimensions
PlumX
Licencia
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.


Marina Englert,

1 ProBrain; São Paulo; Brazil.
2 Centro de Estudos da Voz (CEV); São Paulo; Brazil.


Leticia Borges,

Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas; Campinas; Brazil.


Sandro Soares Almeida,

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein; São Paulo; Brazil.


Ingrid Gielow,

1 ProBrain; São Paulo; Brazil.
2 Centro de Estudos da Voz (CEV); São Paulo; Brazil.
3 Fundação Getúlio Vargas; São Paulo; Brasil.
4 Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein; São Paulo; Brasil.


Objetivo. Analizar los resultados del cribado en línea de AudBility en ancianos para evaluar su viabilidad.

Metodología. El estudio incluyó a 40 ancianos (edad media de 67.4 años). Se sometieron a un cribado en línea de AudBility y completaron un cuestionario de autoevaluación y pruebas que evaluaban siete habilidades auditivas: localización del sonido (LS), tarea dicótica de dígitos, percepción del habla en ruido, cierre auditivo, prueba dicótica de palabras escalonadas (PDE), resolución temporal y ordenamiento temporal. El análisis de datos descriptivos consideró los parámetros de referencia de AudBility: <50% = anormal, 51-79% = precaución, >80% = normal.

Resultados. La prueba con la mayor frecuencia de anomalías fue LS y ordenamiento temporal frecuencia (OTF), ambas con un 22.5%. En promedio, estas pruebas se consideraron como "precaución" (LS = 72.75%; OTF = 67.5%). El cuestionario de autoevaluación tuvo la mayor frecuencia de resultados de "precaución" (52.5%), seguido por PDE (35%) y OTF (32.5%). En promedio, el cuestionario de autoevaluación y OTF mostraron valores de precaución (74.41% y 67.5%, respectivamente). PDE tuvo valores promedio normales (81.5%). Ninguna prueba tuvo valores promedio anormales.

Conclusión. Utilizar AudBility para el cribado auditivo puede servir como punto de partida para evaluar la salud auditiva y cognitiva en la población anciana, orientando derivaciones y terapias antes de las intervenciones presenciales.


Visitas del artículo 174 | Visitas PDF 6


  1. [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, br-pt (IBGE) [Internet]. Population projection [cited 2024/feb/2]. Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/en/statistics/social/population/18176-population-projection.html
  2. World Health Organization [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024. Deafness and hearing loss; 2024 Feb 2 [cited 2024/Feb/2]: [about 6 screens]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss
  3. Lin FR, Metter EJ, O'Brien RJ, Resnick SM, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss and incident dementia. Arch Neurol [Internet]. 2011;68(2):214-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.362
  4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) [Internet]. Rockville: ASHA; n.d. Central Auditory Processing Disorder [cited 2024/feb/2]: [about 30 screens]. Available from: https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/central-auditory-processing-disorder/
  5. Chermak G, Musiek F. Central auditory processing disorder: new perspectives. San Diego: Singular Pub. Group; 1997. 374 p.
  6. Ferguson M, Nakano K, Jayakody DM. Clinical Assessment Tools for the Detection of Cognitive Impairment and Hearing Loss in the Ageing Population. Clin Interv Aging [Internet]. 2023 Dec 7;2023:2041-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S409114
  7. Strouse AL, Hall JW, Burger MC. Central auditory processing in Alzheimer's disease. Ear Hear [Internet]. 1995;16(2):230-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199504000-00010
  8. Liu CM, Lee CT. Association of Hearing Loss With Dementia. JAMA Netw Open [Internet]. 2019;2(7):e198112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8112
  9. Sardone R, Battista P, Donghia R, Lozupone M, Tortelli R, Guerra V, et al. Age-related central auditory processing disorder, MCI, and dementia in an older population of Southern Italy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg [Internet]. 2020 Aug;163(2):348-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820913635
  10. Johnson JCS, Marshall CR, Weil RS, Bamiou DE, Hardy CJD, Warren JD. Hearing and dementia: from ears to brain. Brain [Internet]. 2021;144(2):391-401. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa429
  11. Lau K, Dimitriadis PA, Mitchell C, Martyn-St-James M, Hind D, Ray J.Age-related hearing loss and mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis and systematic review of population-based studies. J Laryngol Otol [Internet]. 2022;136(2):103-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215121004114
  12. Davidson A, Souza P. Relationships between auditory processing and cognitive abilities in adults: a systematic review. J Speech Lang Hear Res [Internet]. 2024;67(1):296-345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00716
  13. Amaral MIRD, Carvalho NG, Colella-Santos MF. Computer-based central auditory processing screening for school-age children (audBility): an initial investigation. Codas [Internet]. 2019;31(2):1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20182018157
  14. Baecke JA, Burema J, Frijters JE. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr [Internet]. 1982;36(5):936-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/36.5.936
  15. Donadon C, Sanfins MD, Borges LR, Colella-Santos MF. Auditory training: effects on auditory abilities in children with history of otitis media. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2019;118:177-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.01.002
  16. Nunes CL, Pereira LD, Carvalho GS. Scale of Auditory Behaviors and auditory behavior tests for auditory processing assessment in Portuguese children. Codas [Internet]. 2013;25(3):209-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s2317-17822013000300004
  17. Peek S, Wouters E, Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije H, Vrijhoef H. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform [Internet]. 2014;83(4):235-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
  18. Mukari S, Hashim W. Self-perceived hearing loss, hearing-help seeking and hearing aid adoption among older adults in Malaysia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Internet]. 2018;127(11):798-805. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489418795982
  19. Filippini R, Brito NFS, Neves-Lobo I, Schochat E. Manutenção das habilidades auditivas pós treinamento auditivo. Audiol Commun Res [Internet]. 2014;19(2)112-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-64312014000200003
  20. Maidment D, Baker AB, Xia J, Ferguson MA. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids in adults with hearing loss. Int J Audiol [Internet]. 2018;57(10):721-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1493546
  21. Flamme GA. Localization, hearing impairment and hearing aids. The hearing journal [Internet]. 2002;55(6):10-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000293272.79202.86
  22. Noble W, Byrne D, Lepage B. Effects on sound localization of configuration and type of hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am [Internet]. 1994;95(2):992-1005. doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408404
  23. Delecrode CR, Cardoso ACV, Frizzo ACF, Guida HL. Pitch pattern sequence and duration pattern tests in Brazil: literature review. Rev CEFAC [Internet]. 2014;16(1):283-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620143912
  24. Rasmus A, Błachnio A. Auditory processing disorders in elderly persons vs. linguistic and emotional prosody. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021;18(12):1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126427
  25. Samara M, Thai-Van H, Ptok M, Glarou E, Veuillet E, Miller S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of questionnaires used for auditory processing screening and evaluation. Front Neurol [Internet]. 2023;14:1243170. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1243170
  26. Kovalová M, Mrázková E, Škerková M, Čada Z, Janoutová J. The importance of screening for hearing loss in the elderly. Otolaryngol Pol [Internet]. 2022;76(3):32-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.6493
  27. Lin FR, Pike JR, Albert MS, Arnold M, Burgard S, Chisolm T, et al. Hearing intervention versus health education control to reduce cognitive decline in older adults with hearing loss in the USA (ACHIEVE): a multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet [Internet]. 2023;402(10404):786-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01406-X
  28. Zanchetta S, Simões HO, Lunardelo PP, Canavezi MO, Reis ACMB, Massuda ET. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Amsterdam inventory for auditory disability and handicap to Brazilian Portuguese. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol [Internet]. 2020;86(1):3-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.07.011
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.7 - Metabiblioteca |